Why the hell would they put someone who doesn't know as much about the controller? That's the whole point of this video, to show people what's new about this controller and how it works. You don't see Sony using anyone other than Cerny to talk about the PS4 hardware, do you?
Yeah, lets put someone other than the person who engineered the controller to explain its architecture. The PS fanboys in this site become even more stupid everyday. (-_-)
Yeah, because the only thing the X1 does is act as a cable box, right? I mean, it's not like the X1 plays videos game, has social apps, records games, broadcasts games (twitch > ustream), lets you use other recording devices, is a dev kit out of the box, filters shitty players, has sports apps, gives you ULIMITED digital storage, or has the most advance sensor out of any platform (even though a lot of people wanted to be optional). So..... yeah, I mean WHO in their right mind would pay...
That's actually a good point. I guess the person who wrote this article hasn't seen anything from E3.
Maybe, maybe not, but from what i've seen thus far, the games on the X1 look just as good as the exclusives for the PS4. So util there is a noticeable difference in graphics, all of hype the PS4 hardware is getting is will be irrelevant.
true story.
I couldn't care less if they changed their policies 1000x as long as they get it right by the time the console releases. Any other time before, NOBODY is being affected. The only people acting butt-hurt are the PS fanboys.
So then I guess we wont be able to definitively say that the PS4 will have the best graphics next-gen.
Actually, no. When it comes to comparing visuals, there isn't as much room for debate as there is for gameplay. Take BF3 for example, although the game was released on 3 platforms, it was clear that the game looked better on PC. But compare the xbox and ps3 verstions of the game, and there is no difference between them.
So based on the exclusives for both the PS4 and the X1, I can honestly say none of the PS4 exclusives look better than the best visually looking game on t...
The PS4's hardware doesn't guarantee you smother games.. hell, it doesn't even guarantee you better looking games all the time.
Let's use cars as an example. Car A has 250 hp and Car B has 300 hp. Even though car B has more hp, you're not guaranteed a smother ride or a more reliable vehicle. The only thing you're guaranteed as a buyer is a more powerful and maybe a faster car. That's about it.
So until we see games will run on bot...
Not blind, just being real. How entertaining or fun a game feels is always debatable. How good or bad a game looks VISUALLY, not so much. You have to stop being bias first.
People can brag about the PS4 having the most powerful hardware, but none to that will mean anything if developers don't take full advantage of it, especially those who develop exclusive games.
Take Kill Zone SF or 1886 or Infamous Son vs Ryse for example, all of these games are exclusives for the PS4 and Xbox One respectively. But if you compare the graphics among these games, you'll notice that Ryse looks visually better than the rest. Even Quantum Break,looks visua...
The positives for the PS4 were pretty much repeated, just worded differently.
I know, that's why I specifically said " the majority of PS4 players..." But think about it, the gaming industry is moving towards online gaming only by combining multi-player and single player.
For example: Need for speed, The Division, The Crew will only be playable online. Other major titles will revolve heavily on multiplayer like Battlefield 4, Kill Zone 3 and COD Ghosts, Planet Side 2, Forza, Drive Club, Killer Instict, Project Spark, and all the other EA...
Do you really have your head that far up your ass? MS started it with the 360. And if you actually knew how to read properly you would've figured out that "PS4 will allow OTHER accounts to Play Online on same Console" NOT HAVE MULTIPLE PEOPLE SHARING THE SAME ACCOUNT. By the way, that link you provided doesn't work... I had to go out of my way to figure out what BS you were trying to pull. Typical PS fanboy... -_-
So much irony in your comment. If you would have done some research, you would've also known that you only need one XBL for the whole family. BTW, where in the Playstation Plus website does it say one account for every user in your home? Stop talking out of your ass for once.
us.playstation.com/psn/playst ation-plus/
Because playing the PS4 online is completely free right? No. PS players have to pay $50 just to play online. Sony knows the majority of their players will get a PSN+ so they market their other features as "free." Already, some of the big titles coming out next year will only be playable online. And you can be sure that there will be a lot more these games down the road. But I do have to give Sony a lot of credit for such brilliant marketing.
Why yes, yes it does.
Unless it's ACTUAL NEW footage, i'm not interested. Already seen Siege Of Shanghai gameplay for 2 months straight.
Honestly, I could care less if they change their minds 1000x as long as they get it right by release. Right now, NOBODY is being affected by these changes; besides, the all of the changes since E3 have been positive. It's not like MS changes their mind every week about the same thing. It's all been steadily positive. So why complain over this trend?