How your own post describes itself, and doesn't even address its own points (that's basically open zone material). I am being agreed with mostly, nobody agrees with you except your duplicate account. You just failed miserably.
Mao can't take any criticism of any console he owns. I am just pointing out that at this rate Microsoft will never take over in Japan. It is way too far from becoming the next PS2 especially in Japan, considering its flagship JRPG's are much worse than PS2's flagship JRPG's. PS3 has no JRPGs, and? I'm not arguing that it has more, I am arguing that the 360 is far away from becoming a PS2, get it? After all, this is a 360 thread, and PS2 is relevant because it was the market leader last gen, e...
And by the way, you call yourself a gamer yet you don't know who my avatar is?
FAILURE.
There is hope in humanity, after all
Who cares, regardless of...?
"AAA" is the most moronic buzzword I have ever heard, and there is no place where I see it uttered more other than here, especially by theMart and his gang. "AAA = 9.0+ in metacritic", seriously, metacritic's apparent level of relevance is ridiculous, and suddenly 9.0 being a cut-off or a complete dismissal of titles that get 8.9 is ridiculous. Hell, an average does not really tell you anything, since 9.0 can mean that all reviewers gave it a 9, or that half gave it a 10 a...
"isaac
how old are you? "
Considering your piss poor grammar, I would say I am about twice your age. But then again, that could be you being a dropout or simply born that way. Anyway, that was a really poor attempt at implying I am immature, considering my argument was logical. Firstknight was simply trolling by implying it would be ridiculous to think PS3 could outsell 360, and I gave him reasons to. But of course, an argument as reasonable as that one only falls...
"Lmao! People believe that the ps3 will catch up to the 360 in 2009? "
PS3 was able to half the lead already and the holiday is not out yet, nor are most of the games, even though 360 is a lot cheaper, was out earlier, has "more games", and more hype. 2009 will be a very rainy year for 360... and the rain is gonna be *heavy* ;) I doubt that the wiimote clone, the home clone, the singstar clone and the buzz clone will do much for the Xbox 360. Is there even any...
"and a ranking with a system that is called Value;"
It means that the ranking system is called "Valor", but valor in spanish means "value" in english. I hate google.
Anyway, there is no way to make it great. Let the series die, I hope there are no sequels and that Dyack is banned from making games forever. No developer should be allowed to hype their game THAT MUCH for THAT MUCH TIME. I hope Duke Nukem gets good scores and sells better to teach Dyack a lesson. Eat sh1t, Dyack. And to think I actually quoted him once in one of my papers because I used to have respect for him... lol
And gave it a C-, which, according to Metacritic, it is a 4.2. Gamereactor gave it a 4.0. GameSpot gave it a 5.5 (but of course, Xbox fanboys like Hulk, which used to say Gamespot was the best, will now say the opposite). Game Informer was "nice" and gave it 6.8. IGN was the only decent website that gave it more than an acceptable. The rest of the websites that gave it good reviews were fansites or Xbox dedicated press.
Stop failing so hard, at least use your SECOND dup...
PS3 has more "AAA" exclusives than Xbox 360 (I hate using the "AAA" acronym because it's a theMart idiocy, but it is just for the sake of the argument).
PS3 has MGS4, Uncharted and Ratchet and Clank.
360 only has Gears of War and Mass Effect, since Bioshock is already multiplatform and Halo 3 does not abide by theMart's rules for a "AAA" game. Mass Effect is getting the port treatment as we speak anyway so 360 will only be left with Gear...
You guys just proved you have sh1t for brains. How about accounting for all of 360s flops, like Bulletwitch, Vampire Rain, Bomberman, and Two worlds?
Also Mart, you fail to give an explanation as to why is a game with "9.0 on metacritic" significantly better than a game with 8.9 on Metacritic, and why is Metacritic actually relevant. How is it that somehow 8.9 is the cut-off? According to metacritic, MGS4 is on the same level as Gears of War and Halo, the highest rated ...
Killzone 2 looks awesome and I hope there are no framerate drops in the final product the way it happens to Too Human. Multiplayer looks intense, I am just not very convinced about its single player though
It was met with two excellent reviews from fanboys of countries like greece, few "almost good but not quite" reviews from paid lobbyists like IGN for example, mostly mediocre reviews, and several horrible reviews from honest gamers around the world.
Mixed, maybe? Well, at least there is one thing that can make Xbox fanboys sleep at night, and breakfast will agree with me: Killzone is the next too Human.
XD
awesome?
EGM gave it a 4.2 (check metacritic, the site you love, not N4G's forgiving "6" which is fake). Gamereactor gave it a 4. Gamespot a 5.5. The ones that gave it better scores were either fanboy sites, Xbox sites, or apologists like X-plays pereira. Microsoft stopped hyping the game because they knew it was too horrible to be shown to the public. Dyack was always nervous when they previewed the game with 1up. This game is mediocre at best, just look at the horrible graphics (considerin...
*puts fanboy on ignore list*
*wonders why he had 5 bubbles in the first place*
"your basically assuming that all RPGs that are on ps3 are all AA"
He never mentioned the PS3, he could have been talking about Wii, PC, or hell, even PS2. The point is, 360 has lots of JRPGs. MEDIOCRE ONES, so who cares?
Oh well, I guess people change to the convenience of times.