Innoxent

Not everyone.

@kingkratos

His only flaw was in saying everyone and he's not flat out wrong. People that played the first also don't like the second. It exists.

Good point about mass effect 3. In that game some were okay with the story...others were not. And thank god for those guys cuz the story was just downright horrible..specifically the ending

Gameplay is vastly improved for sure.

Haven't been able to play all day unfortunately.
I have responsibilities at home outside of gaming unfortunately.

Yes but that narrative is bots and fanboys so you don't exist in their minds.

Like a jigsaw puzzle that doesn't fit where you want it to.

So you and others get lumped together. Why? Because they, also like the people giving zeros, are heartbroken when they see the user score...they feel threatened and attacked.

Metacritic is broken for sure.
It isn't just the. User scores that's an issue.

They weight certain outlets higher than others...and these are approved outlets mind you not some random new ones.

I've heard open critic is better but I generally don't bother with aggregate review score sites anyways.

Steam requires having played the game...so thats one of the better ones.

Is handling equal to saying it's good? If they didn't like it why would they rate it high?

Should fix the title there appears to be a missing "s". And I would say psychopathic women in the way they murder people. But to each his own. Lol

Nathan Drake was a serial killer as well.

Why is there an article on something so obvious.
Currently the only graphics better than this game is real life.

You think they'll actually add more "graphics"?

It'll probably be a resolution/framerate bump like the first one was for ps4.

Not foe for everyone it wasn't.

And the buns can sweat.

They probably removed cheese all together in this eutopia.

The hamburgers are probably made of fake meat

The real question is can you throw the hamburger at the enemies?

Is it secretly a combat tool?

@synth

Obviously I the context I half agree but I also agree that the person using the word is also not tolerant of the others views so therefore both bigots.

But I was more referring to the implementation of such dialogue. It's stupid and out of the blue and only wanted to include that line for the sake of progressives and their outlook on the world and all people who disagree or more specifically don't fully agree.

Nobody is a...

I don't agree with that sentiment.
Nothing new is happening here that hasn't happened before.

And no I do not believe that the users who do not like the story or direction ever wanted to cancel the game. They wanted to try to push change. Normally this type of behavior is praised...but only if it pushes towards a certain direction it seems.

The outrage is also only online one the comments section and Twitter. Outside if all that there is ...

There's only a handful. And hate is not the word to use. More like critical articles on the game.

Not saying the game is bad. But reviews that are not to your liking can and will exist.

@sam
Right. Journalists have never insulted any group of people. Called them bigots or shameful or anything. You clearly don't read much.

And I know other people have as well but journalists are the only ones who maintain that they're in the high horse.

@synth
Same as above. You must not read much as there are articles right now about how the people that don't like the game are x y and z.
You made the assumption abou...

Journalists: either you agree with our critical reception or youre a bigot, homophobe, radical, racist transphobe, privelaged crybaby.
Btw we also fan the flames of war between people because we're so righteous.

@sage

But it's not an Xbox game. Not the time for guessing.

You first sentence isn't s good reason. That is your opinion. They according to you can only have one if it matches yours?
Your next sentence is your assumption. But nice keywords there: blind, hate, annoying...really shows how you react to opposing views.