You're right, it is a 360 comparison, and Metro 2033 looks better than Fallout...
Don't reply to me, reply to your circle jerking partner to whom I was referring to. Why bring up Metro when you haven't played it? I know why, you like to spread that false propaganda that suffocates n4g articles. I've never played a Splinter Cell game. The comment that champ made was ridiculous so I called him/her on it. I brought up Brink because it looks to surpass a certain game that was over hyped and undersold til this very day. Name any game on consoles and I've played it...minus MAG. ...
I'm not sure, but I think you go to Metro 2033 game details and go to dlc and go from there...I think.
You don't have all the 360's exclusives so stop lying to yourself and others...
Edit: People are disagreeing with the truth? The term sheep comes to mind...ah, never mind.
Halo(duh? I'm certain of it)
Forza (If I was into racing games I'd buy it, but the car in my avi...I own one.)
Fable (I thought there wasn't variety on the 360)
Gears 2 (Campaign sucks imo, online is my go to...for online shooting)
Fallout will prove to be a great game, I'm sure, not relying on graphics. But after playing Metro 2033 and witnessing such extreme details from the environments on up to the gun models and characters, Fallout will be hard to look at. Metro 2033 almost made me a graphics whore...almost.
I agree mal_tez92...I find button mashers repetitive and boring.
@champ21...
You're trying to tell me the 360 isn't capable, but yet Brink is at least 45 fps 720p expecting to hit 60 fps? I keep running into your stupid comments...twice today. Only one solution for that...
Damn, I thought it was going to be that detailed gas mask...
The same goes for the statement PS3 graphics blow the 360's graphics out of the water. The differences are slight and minute. So saying Live blows PSN out of the water and PS3 graphics blow the 360s out of the water, are both stupid comments.
On topic, if your first experience is PSN and then you experienced Live, you probably think with Live, "whats the big deal?". But if you began with Live then you'll notice a slight edge it has over PSN. Is the difference worth payi...
This isn't anything new. They go back and forth at the #1 spot often. But I guess if you don't use that list this is news for you.
But there is DLC on the way...hopefully soon. I'm on my second playthrough and I thought about trading it in, but that'll be based on what the dlc content has to offer and when. I wouldn't mind spending $10-15 on an extra 3 or more hours of the game...
You're right,I should have said its My Favorite exercise:p
Because they don't get any p*ssy. So they don't know that sex is the best exercise...EVER!
I have yet to play MW2, but I played the Bad Company demo and...meh.
I was getting ready to say Penny lost a bubble and an N. Guess he isn't BubbliN,HA!
These pics don't do the game any justice. You have to see it in motion on both platforms.
This sh*t sounds expensive, lol...
The dev couldn't pony up those payoffs. Seriously though, people are doing themselves a disservice by not playing this game. I'm opposed to pirating, but any other way is fair game...
Couldn't agree with you more iBeyond...
I've been playing this game for 2 days now courtesy of a "real" midnight launch...
Valve's Source engine is a bottle-neck for graphics intensive games, while UE3 and Cryengine are more feasible for better graphics and gameplay...summary, but keep reading.