All Channels
Popular
CRank: 5Score: 30140

I can understand remaking it. What I don't understand is why remake it so soon? I hope this is the exception to the rule since it was so highly acclaimed. I would absolutely hate to see an army of games that have just been released on last gen in the last 2 years suddenly all get remade in 2015.

I'm just getting tired of remakes. Let's have some new/different games.

4314d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I think a lot of companies rushed to show something for the new consoles too soon, making it seem like release dates would be sooner than they actually would be.

4315d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

it looks good but the longer it goes between announcing it and releasing it, the more skeptical I become. Current release date is sometime in 2015.. approx 2 years after it was announced.

They really shouldn't have started talking about the game so early on if it's not even going to come close to being ready for years.

4315d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

article pretending like there's some sort of controversy.

4316d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I don't think people connect the dots - that if a game goes onto PC from XB1 it's still a win for Microsoft. You still need Windows to play these games on PC.

4316d ago 8 agree21 disagreeView comment

they admitted it after they got everyone's money

4317d ago 76 agree37 disagreeView comment

@Rock-Lee

Last of Us PS3 only sold about 5 million. Since there's 80 million PS3s out there I guess it's a failure right?

4317d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

Cuz Samus doesn't exist.

4319d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

no I think it has to do with being a year late. A lot of projects that are late by this long end up badly as they rush to get it out the door.

This is not to say that this won't end up being a good game. I imagine it probably will be a decent game. Not great, but worth playing.

I think Sony screwed up by announcing it a year too early. They didn't just show the game and say 'coming soon', they said it would be out. And it wasn't. P...

4319d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

year one in this case. HOPEFULLY.

4320d ago 1 agree5 disagreeView comment

Yes and no. On the 360 you get to keep the games, on the XB1 it works the same as PS+

4321d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment

You're probably right. They could have just had the IP worked on by another company and let Bungie do what they want and still kept them. That's what they're ending up with anyway now, with 343

4323d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

you're going to be playing dead rising 1 and 2 on PS
Now? How is that exactly

EDIT: Nevermind me. I thought DR 1& 2 were still exclusive

4323d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

prob because the latency is too high for that sort of game and they're trying to hide that fact

4323d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

I can't even imagine why this was a thing.

4327d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

which one went down for a month :) Sorry but until XBL goes down for an entire month or becomes unstable for more than a few hours, PSN will always have the title of worst online service between the two.

4329d ago 50 agree59 disagreeView comment

BF is NOT fast paced lol regardless of frame rate. Also please consider that Bungie said that only 10% of the game is available in the beta and they've also already got 2 expansions planned.

4331d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

They've probably quoted Sony a price/deal in the past that Sony didn't like, and they're holding out for that.

4331d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Bruce Campbell for Sully

4331d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

you are aware that all VR systems including Morpheus have 3D by default simply because they have to, being so close to your eyes?

4331d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment