Could not agree more, a simple button press helps the entire team.
dedicated servers.
Edible food.
I won't buy if there is blatant racism that is not related to the plot. Also if children being killed is shown.
People have freedom of speech, but that doesn't mean I have to listen to them or give them my support.
That's why this is optional.
No, DMC fans thought that the game would not sell because it would be crap. However, the game is pretty good. How can you condemn a game even though it isn't bad?
2143 should stick with the near future guns. Battlefield has never had lasers in their games before and I think it would be too cartoony to take seriously.
In all honesty, Commander mode does not need to return. People just want it in because they forgot how it was only useful for spamming airstrikes.
Why the hell would Anon DDOS Xbox Live over an Always Online RUMOR???
They could've at least waited to see if it really was true or not. This is just dumb and very foolish.
(At least I can still sign into Live though)
there were a few parts they left out of the gameplay trailer. Who knows what the game really plays like.
Next to nothing? They released a 17 minute gameplay video this early. And you can always cancel the preorder if you want.
correction: Expansion packs.
Comparing a modern military shooter with RPG games because fuck logic right?
Just say that you like realistic shooters. saying ARMA is better than Battlefield is like saying Gran Turismo is better than GRID. Both are great games, just different styles.
EA isn't a shining example of a gaming corporation, however to vote it worse than a company that has killed people is ludicrous.
Gamers can be real idiots.
basically one person on each team lays down at the back of their base and looks at a map. They can issue artillery strikes, supplies, and vehicles that no one picks up. They can also issue orders to different squads that no one even obeys. The only good thing a commander can do is artillery strike and UAV.
I'd rather have the commander in the battle manning a tank than one in the back spamming arties for free kills.
BF4 has New China location, Rapid fire grenade launcher, dual sights, WAY better graphics, new characters, and a Chinese faction. Plus new vehicles and weapons of course.
It's too early to judge whether either game will be good or not but we can say that they are both adding new things.
I understand where he's coming from. If this DLC turns out to be bad, Ubisoft will never hear the end of it. But if it's good, is it still FarCry?
The intern.
IF games reflect life, when aren't men killing each other?