:'(
Now it averages at 100/100 XD
No longer more than perfect.......now it's ONLY exactly perfect.
lol
Just like with the gameinformer survey, people will cry:
''ZOMG! You says tis is teh facts but is jus teh servay!''
When it's just a survey that was never meant to be taken as fact.
These are his findings and those were Game Informer's findings.
Get over it.
I want to see shooters, sword play, ACTION!
Now tennis, I can do that in real life. And I'd prefer to.
...I knew it would be a bunch of multiplats and ODST.
.....ROFL!
And with awesome games like:
*MGS4
*Killzone 2
*Resistance 1/2
*Uncharted 1
......it's a real shame :(
You've earned it, BBC :)
Come on, IW. Step it up.
Now, back to the conversation at hand...
BBC's report is incredibly bias and one sided.
Just like FOX and MSNBC reports. Yes, both of them.
Libertarians FTW :)
Their rating scale seems to consist of 3 ratings.....
arbitrarily low, 8, and 9.5
I wonder what they'll rate it.
It'll be interesting to see what they score it.
IGN tends to rate very high or very low, though.
I'll probably wait for other reviews.
...buy the PS3 slim and COD:MW2 for $360, and realize they have no need for a whopping 250GB.
Besides, with LIVE, it would be $450.
...it were a part of the Wiimote from the beginning, as it should have been.
Just so you guys know.
....since it's also a product within the acceptable consumer product failure rate.
''Welcome to Wiispace.com, a great place for all your gaming needs and information from around the industry. Our title may have the word Wii in it, but rest assured we are a multi-platform gaming community''
They review plenty of other stuff without bias
and
the diction sounds correct.
I think they over reacted a little to the short length, but it seems legit to me.
''Spanish term for a fig leaf gourd that resembles a watermelon''
...most of these people wouldn't be screaming
"No name site!!"
"Bias!!"
"Fake!!"
"(Etc)!!"