All Channels
Popular
Is the Socratic method a method of genius?

HolyOrangeCows

Contributor
CRank: 6Score: 72710

Who says ''oy!''?
Seriously......who?

6127d ago 0 agree8 disagreeView comment

....that I'm not an Australian gamer.

6127d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

....then it's not really a big deal.

6128d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Now GT just has to put the right settings on the PS3, and you wouldn't even see the lighting difference.

6128d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Do you want more developers making games with:
*Short Campaigns?
*Multiplayer Maps Recycled from previous game?
*Only one new mode?

And all at the price of $60?
As a gamer and a fan of all the Halo games, I don't want that for my games! I don't want developers finding that method of development to be attractive!

6128d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

It's two different writers.

And if you know what Associated Content IS, you will know that is extremely significant.

6129d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

*6 hour campaign (And 4 hours without exploration)
*Recycled Halo 3 MP
*One new mode

Doesn't sound like a $60 package to me.

Agreed with Godmars290.

6129d ago 6 agree2 disagreeView comment

:'(

EDIT: Sorry about the double post. Accidentally hit enter. I'm surprised it went through without the ''required'' text in the ''your comment'' part.

6129d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

6129d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Or ultimately another ''giantbomb'' site :P

6129d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

And I will say XBL is worth it when IT ''starts handling the match making servers for every game on XBL''

Because it does not. Third parties are just as much on their own on XBL.

6129d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

How about PLAYING games instead?

Anyway, Demon's Souls is looking freaking amazing.

6130d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's cute how you assume it's Sony-only fans.
But the truth is, not everyone is content with throwing $50 away just because they can afford it.

Go play in the open zone with the others who can't stand others having varied opinions.

6130d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

For a guy who just wants to play some games (On mostly third party servers), I don't have reason to pay $50 a year. That's good VG money.
Their servers aren't any better than on other platforms.

I don't need Netflix, Facebook, chatting options (Which are nice, but I have several devices for communication), etc.

6130d ago 6 agree5 disagreeView comment

''Gary A Swaby would like to apologize for this article as it was a misunderstanding of the quote made by Valve. The Koalition itself holds no responsibility for the misinformation of this article.

The real news topic is about Valve wanting to sell their mods through Xbox live as quoted in OXM.''

6130d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

It is NOT $8 a month, it's $50 for an unforeseen year of LIVE.

Remember when Xbox LIVE pretty much crashed in early 2008?

6130d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Their servers aren't any better than on other platforms.
I don't want to pay $50 a year for chat options and some non-gaming related stuff.

6130d ago 10 agree2 disagreeView comment

I mean, after Eye toy 2, the possibilities are endless!

6130d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Why just video games? Why not television, books, toys...I see no reason that kids couldn't imitate those things.

6130d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Come and waste $200 more on our products, plz.

6131d ago 5 agree4 disagreeView comment