people who dont know warcraft lore think that panda's are something new in wow...when pandaran have been in warcraft for ages.
I would rather have a game with fantastic multiplayer than a game with fantastic singleplayer. The reason is simple. You can only play the sp so long before it becomes stale, while the mp gives you far more bang for your buck in the long run. Plus gamers have shown that they vastly prefer a solid multiplayer experience to a solid singleplayer experience, and companies have followed where the people are putting their money.
Also building an AI is horrendously difficult.
Another random site, posting random crap. Seriously why wouldnt they use paypal. Its the largest online processor of transactions, its easy to use and insert into websites. People who lose disputes dont take the time to protect themselves, or dont take the time to follow through the dispute process.
Arbitration is almost always better for the consumer in the end than class actions. Individual attention to the details of YOUR case and more importantly, the vampire lawyers dont steal 99% of the award for themselves.
Even Jim Sterling gave this game a 95...somethings fishy here.
its not on steam...i only need one.
imo portal 2 and witcher 2 were both better games
Not like ohm runes and crap like that didnt ruin d2...oh wait....
Who the hell played diablo 2 NOT online? Cause everyone I know that played it, including myself, played it on bnet. Just because they require you to be in logged in to bnet to play, doing the logical thing and cutting out all the third party assholes who ruined d2 by doing it legitly themselves, and by simplifying a cluttered stats system, people are now bashing the hell out of blizz. Just dont understand it.
I buy games based on whether or not I will enjoy them. Who publishes it, who's developing it, I could care less. All I care about is that the game is enjoyable for me to play. If you care about anything else, I question whether your really a gamer at all.
I love how people take koticks words out of context. A CEO talking in business speak is gonna sound cold to most people, but then his sole job is to a) ensure the profitability of his company and b) increase profits or margins.
someone else thats gonna get boned by the dmca, even worse than geohot because hes actually building a hardware method to bypass.
Valve's not going to lose money over this. They are already making huge chunks of cash, so EA choosing NOT to use the DD system that 70% of people use is just stupid on their part, it isnt going to hurt Steam at all.
Well dumb as hell move by ea...but cant say I didnt see it coming. EA has always proven themselves ready to screw over their customers and this is no different from any other time.
the whole reason crysis 2 got kicked was because crytek made a dlc pack exclusive to one platform, which violated the TOS with steam, getting the product removed.
i would say ea needs steam far more than steam needs ea, with approx 70% of the dd marketshare, thats a HUGE hit from sales that EA could potentially lose.
If only gfwl didnt suck so much compared to EVERY other available dd client...
With a little luck the N version of windows 8 wont have this crap on it.
16:9 is far and away the most common pc monitor ratio...you apparently know absolutely nothing about monitors.
Your standard commercial monitor is 16:9 (ie 1920x1080). Dont talk out of your ass if you have no clue what your talking about.
PCI compliance is the standard by which all companies are held for credit card information protection, if sony was PCI complaint (which as a major corp dealing with credit cards they probably were) this and all the other cases are dead in the water.
A) interplay makes far superior fallout games.
B) fallout 3/nv is probably the second worst entry in the fallout series, it beats tactics, but thats about it.