I don't mind it being low budget, as long as it's true to the series
Well, then we got Titanfall...
Exactly, for some reason people think a review is an unbiased factual thing. but it's actually a very personal encounter IMHO.
I dislike reviews which read like a fact sheet. I want to know if the game had the power to move the player, if I will connect to it, how immersive it is etc etc
Waiting for prem is the way to go, IF you can play the waiting game
If Hardline fails the expectations then I fear the franchise will be over. It was a bold move to move away from its traditional military war zones to a cops and robbers arena. It's gonna make or break the series.
I've a feeling the Order won't be so awesome, although I'm hoping it will. My money's on Bloodborne to be epic
"PS4 outsells XB1 7 to 1 in Spain" Ouch
Thanks for that
Article doesn't accuse GamerGate? Asks GG to use its influence to support anti-terrorist behavior
Why not use the influence to tweet with said hashtag? I wonder if the threats were carried out people would still say, "yeah, University did what they could"
It will perhaps take off with mobile gamers, but I doubt the PC or console market will give the Nexus a second thought
Down boy, down
I would've liked more details on the "competitive"
Fair point
How about a review that touches on all the aspects of the game. Why should it be limited to graphics, gameplay etc? What's wrong with also talking about social issues? Why should it be excluded?
EXACTLY
Freaking cool shit
I for one welcome reviews that provide "deeper critique." Times have also changed, and the gaming audience as well as games have evolved. Games are no longer just about guns and action, it has ventured into the arena of social critique. Gamers also want to know about more than just good graphics and framerate.
Personally I enjoyed FC1 the most, FC2 felt very repetitive after a few hours.
I am disappointed in the ruling.