The SP was better than most COD games but they got to fix the framerate on PS3. COD isn't COD without near 60 FPS.
I'm not seeing a major difference between the 360 and PS3 here, but definitely the PC is vastly superior.
Kotick you screwed them over, I hope it goes to trial and there's a bunch of gamers in the jury.
I expected a better frame rate for the PS3 version.
They should fix the PS3 framerate. COD is all about that smoothness, at 40FPS the smoothness isn't there.
That's one good looking game, it really making me wonder why my Black Ops has a lower resolution and framerate than the 360 version.
That's one good looking gun!
This is unrelated, but I think the next game should have some background story on why Drake is so good at the killing. Seriously, he had to have some special forces training for his hand to hand fighting skills and his ability handle all those guns so well.
Maybe he got kicked out of some elite special forces unit for sarcastic remarks to a superior officer or something. There's no way he's a regular man.
I bet they're capable of maintaining the same framerate and resolution of previous PS3 COD games!
To truly appreciate PS3 exclusives (with the exception of MGS4) you have to see them in motion - it's the animation and post-processing that makes them look quasi-CG like.
IMO Halo has better SP, Killzone better MP - I always find Halo MP soooo boring.
RROD and loss of all exclusives except for Gears and Fable lost the lead, the latter may sink them next gen.
I think if the people voted it would be COD4. It elevated the COD franchise to superstar status. COD is the biggest thing in entertainment now.
I rather pay activision 10 bucks a year with the possibility of free game improvements, than MS 60 bucks a year for nothing really.
I just want MW2s resolution and frame rate on PS3 and I'd be happy.
Yeah that part is some bad game design.
My biggest issue is PS3 resolution and framerate
Considering MS used to charge 100 bucks for a WiFi adapter lol, I'd say they're improving.
That WiFi must have cost them 10 bucks to make.
I blame Treyarch for this one, how they release a game 2 years later and make it look worse than the previous game they made is beyond me. WaW looked better on PS3, and had a higher frame rate. IW kept MW2 in 50+ FPS rate. Has Treyarch become less talented or what's going on over there.
If it didn't hit a mill in it's first week it pretty lame considering how much they've spent on it.