You do know the game on PS3 was 720p right?,make a screenshot with 720p and 1080p if you can't tell the difference i would stick to 720p.lol
But as mentioned these SS are compressed,there's definetely going to be a difference.
Yeah,September is TOO LONG,lol.
Well,the problem with them making an expensive console is not so much core gamers but the general public,hence why so many multi-media apps are in these consoles,but at a low price (general public tablets/phones),you will lose a big segment of your target audience when you do make a powerful system at a high price range.
To those that pre-ordered the game to get the beta and expect the beta to be exclusive are sorry to say morons,you get early access,a beta will eventually become public to test a significant server load and how it will handle it.
I suggest you boot up the game on the PS3 and then look closely,this looks way sharper than the PS3 version.
I had no issue with 30FPS and i'm used to UT3 on PC,if anything is fast when it comes to FPS it's that franchise and i could still enjoy this beta.
10 minutes?,believe me it gets better the more you play it,and i find it hilarious when people say a shooter game is repetitive,what does that in essence mean?
If anything this game presents missions on the go instead of on-rails,especially co-op is fun to play.
There's no shooter that doesn't repeat it's core gameplay over and over again,that can't even be a complaint.
This game has a lot of potential,still loving the beta ATM.
lol
I just wonder though,if any company should be glad to still have fans after the mess that was the 360 it should be Microsoft,and the X1 had a bit of a perception issue is the icing on the cake.
Seriously man,there's so many variables that are in Sony's favor now that were the main reasons with the 7th gen why people still went for the 360,it wasn't for the exclusives alone,hell there were only a few of them.
You have to be really dedicated to A: k...
Already said something towards you but somehow ended up elsewhere,but received a response much more related to the fundemental problem that you're referring to.
They might render 1080p but how about the FPS?,some games in that regard are developed so they would be 1080p/60fps on both systems like Wolfenstein is,and i expect certain games to be equally on both accounts.
It's obvious though that certain games have higher res while running 30fps like WD is,unless Ubisoft did that on purpose because Sony was really advertising the shit out of this game and of course having a movie deal between them.
I forsee a lot of BS this ...
Dafuq not what i was replying to.
People should learn that performance of games is up to developers,CoD ghosts for example that game runs and looks terrible on PS4 but lets not forget the relationship Activision has with MS where they receive XBL money,look at their official forum and see the active Xbox support while the playstation versions get very little to none support,in general the newer systems get sloppy ports the focus still remains on the bigger instal base.
LOL,owning a PC i can say neither impress me HW-wise.
That doesn't change the fact that the PS4 gives you more for your money which i also own,buying an X1 at this point is a waste since none of their top tier games have even been released yet.
What happened now is that SONY did everything better compared to 7th gen,and MS and N seem to have 2006/2007 mentality.
No not a deja vu,PS2 wasn't technically more powerful and even more so they still used exotic architecture.
That PS3 launch seems ages ago.
:p
With Deus Ex:HR they were able to grab the essence,this is a mix of many things but nothing essentially to make it a good revisited of the series.
Totally agree on that,PS3 version with Left Behind was €80 in total for me,and we get no benefits from it,even when the game is just barely 1 year old.