GrimmyReaper

Still kinda sucks though.

Ratchet and Clank A Crack in Time still looks great, even today and that runs at 60fps locked.
It's one of the reasons why I still consider it the best of the series.

I like Ratchet and Clank (on ps4) but to just cut the framerate in half for visuals is something I seriously don't agree on. 60 FPS is just simply better and for me personally, if all future Ratchet and Clank games are gonna be 30 FPS, I don't t...

"All the power of a PC in your hand"

I'm sorry, but you can't possibly expect to go from locked 60 fps or higher to fluctuating frame rates.
I know, it's a handheld, but I can't look past stability just because of that

Well thankfully I'll be dead by then.

Hooking yourself up to machines to take you to a different reality because you used to enjoy just relaxing and playing games?

Matrix was considered ludicrous, now it seems people want that thing. No, not saying "Machines are taking over, get your tin foil hat". But if we get to that level, we really have failed then.

And I love the excuse always. "You just haven't tried VR ye...

So 10 years in development hell and multiplayer and extra characters are paid DLC?
What's next? Carskins as microtransactions? >_>

No. Simple as that.

We have seen it so many times and every time it's the same result.

People call x revolutionary, say it will replace the default, it doesn't and it's forgotten.

For 30 years now, we still game on screens with a box that plays games and a controller or mouse and keyboard to control them.
And that is fine. They are standards for a reason. Because they work. And I've said it before and I'll s...

Yea because no company has ever done THAT before, right? Hiding bugs and glitches and poor optimization?

Remember Watch Dogs? Remember Battlefield 4? Remember Assassin's Creed Unity? Look up most of the embargo's on triple A games these days. These companies don't tell you so people like you don't notice. And then people bitch about it and then comes the next game and all is forgotten. This absolutely doesn't affect consumers. How?

Tho...

Or a nightmare.

Wow, it just seems Battlefield can't catch a break.
Hopefully it's fixed soon.

Do we have genuine numbers on the player base of the microsoft store?
I know absolutely no one who uses it.

Gamers not for big games.
Casuals just use phones.
People that use it for surfing and what not, use photoshop, chrome ect.

What is even the point of the store? And does it have any advantages?

Like many have stated.
As wide as an ocean, but as deep as a puddle.

Duh. Where I live, people use to play it every day. You could see kids, adults, seniors and all different sort of people playing together, chatting and what not. Now, one would say the game never released here.

And it is simply all Niantic's fault. Your greed made you blind to see you could have made 2 or 3 times the profit if you just made sure the game worked and didn't shit all over your consumers.

"Because we here at Ubisoft, why would we ever lie to you? We only want the best for players and we would never try to disappoint them by making false promises, especially not in video format where the game might be downgraded drastically. So remember, here at Ubisoft, our only goal is to make sure U bi soft and buy our shit. Thank you"

Fuck ads ........ but this one was alright :p

Won't call it a waste of money but future of gaming?
Eum, yea no. Many games just don't either work better with VR or just don't work with VR at all (gameplay wise, not technically)

It could never be used for LOL or DOTA or any MOBA efficiently. Map awareness is the key for MOBA's and VR would just slow you down.
It could never be really used for counter strike, battlefield, battlefront or COD or titanfall because fast reactions and precise...