Because last i checked, this game is a first person perspective shooter, just like killzone 2 is, and no other site is dumb enough to give this game a higher score than killzone 2.
Hell, one site even gave this game a 3/10, way to go edge with your 8/10!! you really showed how professional you are.
but i agree, the low perspective is weird, although you don't notice it when you play the game at all.
Killzone 2 sure as hell is being judged against other games? why doesn't xbox or wii games get judged against other great games?
marios great, but why doesn't it have coop mode? hmm minus 1 point, hmm mario doesn't have a gun? wtffff omgg wtfbbq, -10 points, ok what's next... hmm, no zombies -1, no naked girls, -20, let's seeeeee, marios character model looks unrealsitic, and there's a pixel missing from his mustache -30!!! omg, wtffff a pixel error, omgggg faill faill, flooopp t...
They added many sites that only reviewed the single player, it got docked points on meta for that... so why would they wait for good scores?
Man i'm struggling to play to get the platinum trophy, it's getting so boringggg, glad i don't have to pay for this dlc.. god that would suck.
Why does it need to come out at the end of the month ugh... i hope they use this time to patch things, instead of making us wait for no reason.
"We thought we'd get grilled for making a run of the mill on rails shooter, but apparently not!!"
funny how edge calls out killzone 2 which is significantly better than this game, for being generic, when it isn't even close to as generic as this game! the devs even admit their game is generic and crappy lol. edge sucks.
The second funniest part is, "we got a review from a swedish mag, and they gave our game a 3/10, we took that as a compliment" an...
ill buy a wii when they get a game that's actually decent, they all suck, the gym is for working out, not a video game btw people, that's why you're still fat. lol, idiots...
None of the people who bought it have a brain. simple.
Positive or negative articles aren't going to change that fact, they have too many good games, and too many good games coming to just disappear. sony might reconsider the ps4, but they plan to make money from the ps3 and they will.
Fact is, if the ps3 and xbox were the same price, the ps3 would crush the xbox in sales, and might compete with the wii on sales for awhile.
The only site i trust to give a good review is ign, they are never biased towards anything, and if they are, it barely shows.. ill stick to them, and a less extent gametrailers and eurogamer.
Show sales a little later on... after march we'll see who's at the top.
I wish the store would sell it to me earllyyy. lamers
as people's rrod warrenty just ended and people need to buy new 360's now.. i wonder if thats where the sales came from, i'm sure more replacements will come soon...
Fingers crossed.
Try it, you'll get owned, you can tell that just from the demo, it's not like halo 3 and cod 4 in that sense, where you get 5 kills from spreading shots. it's alot harder to get kills eh.
It's alot better than halo 3 and cod 4.
If they turned on full colors on the ps3, it would look the same or better, also need to enable super white, if you want a better image, the default settings on the ps3 aren't set for hd, oddly enough... no idea why. but yeah...
you'd think "professional reviewers" would know this.
3 hours of gameplay for 60 bucks, M$ really likes to nickel and dime the people....
The ps3 gets all kinds of great games, and all xbox gets is halo and gears. so yes, 2009 is the year of the ps3.