94/100 after 114 reviews ties it with 2018. That’s very impressive to match one of the highest rated games of all-time.
94/100 after 95 reviews. 😳
94 after 63 reviews.
Let’s see where it’s at after 100 reviews to know if it will rate higher than 2018 overall. I hope it can.
Being that it costs more than the required PS5 I think it is too expensive. I don’t care about what all comes packages with it either.
$549 Sheeeiiidddd!
I’ll pass. If it were a standalone console the price would make sense but if you need a PS5 to play it the price shouldn’t be higher than the console. Now the thing with it not being backwards compatible is really going to stick out.
Nicki Minaj in the Modern Warfare 2 commercial threw me off. 😂
It’s not clear why the decline because the old model is still available at the same price. They only added two newer more expensive options. So it sounds like the decline would have occurred regardless of the revamp.
This is good news for Sony however they should not be content with this statement. They really need to start thinking about making a new IP to rival a COD. They have truly abandoned the genre after KZ:Shadow Fall.
This guy gets it. If anything COD being exclusive to XBox would have some PS diehards purchasing both systems. PlayStation isn’t more popular than XBox because of COD.
I gave up trying to beat those Valkyries. I may have beaten like 4 of them.
I think GP works for shorter single player and indie games.
When it comes to games like Starfield and Forza that are intended to be played for months and even years long it is probably best to just outright pay for the games themselves.
That’s just my take on it.
No it would be stupid unless of course you find stupidity funny. In that case I see where you are coming from.
That would only hurt Sony because they have no issues selling the PS5 as is. They still haven’t met the initial demand and we are about 2 years in now.
Why cut into your profit when you don’t have to?
I’m just here for the comments. Don’t mind me. 😂 🍿
Great news I suppose.
What are you asking me for? That is what the reviewer said.
Why are they showing TW3 as the thumb nail when they are in fact talking about the first one?
By the way I am all for this.
Story was a bit of a letdown but they score it 9/10?
I can see looking past the performance hiccups as that can be patched later but the story is an intricate part of the game.
I think it’s safe to say that as long as the multiplayer is on point this franchise is no where near stale. 90% focus on MP only.
That def remains to be seen.