Fluttershy, Insomniac isn't Bioware, dummy.
There are plenty of publishers with multiple teams running multiple projects. Sony has several studios with numerous ongoing projects and teams. I don't know why this is such a difficult concept for plebs to grasp but the disagrees keep coming in lol
Thing is, there can be multiple teams doing multiple projects. One Insomniac team can do Spiderman, another can do Ratchet and Clank, another can do Resistance. It just depends on whether Sony is willing to grow the team enough and pay for more offices to do more work.
It's still barely worth having as tons of problems still exist with the game. You only see it as better because of the giant turd it was at launch, but as it stands it's just a polished turd.
Additionally, if they actually fulfilled their vision before launching the game, there would be more than 1-6000 players on average playing this game, if the data from the servers is correct.
The numbers went way up in July of 2018 and quickly dropped off the next months, and a...
The publisher is STILL paying devs to work on this game. It must be out of guilt because I don't think anyone is still playing it.
Way to finish a game 3 years after its initial release guys.
Fitting your name is Scatterbrain ^^
Because what you said isn't just dumb, it's incoherent and no one has a clue what you're blabbing about.
As long as Intellectual Property rights still exist, there will be exclusives. There will never be a world without them. As long as, for example, Nintendo owns the IP for Mario and Zelda, they'd be complete fools to just hand that over to another Publisher, removing any competitive advantage they had.
Perhaps he meant Scammervision, upon reading this he'll realize it was better than his original idea and so he'll be like "Yeah, that's what I was trying to say"
I know right? How about if someone wants cheaper games, do some promotion for indy games that have zero marketing budget and are made with nothing but passion for games, those guys aren't getting paid unless they sell more games! There's no salary and no benefits. Just sell games on PSN store, that's it.
Your entire comment boils down to "People shouldn't like what they like, they should like what I like"
MGS3 isn't on the list. It has the greatest stealth based boss battle of all time, against The End.
MGS Peace Walker is better than a lot of the titles on the list as well. Chaos Theory would have been better had you actually been able to see something, it was either pitch dark 99% of the game or you had to play the entire thing with a green screen night vision goggle view, which looked horrible after a while as it didn't allow the graphics to really show off. I'm sure ...
Darth, No. Driv3r was garbage, and F3AR was meh.
It's just cheesy.
Guy's acting like PES will absolutely never be available for PS + for any reason ever. Such whiny entitled hyperbole. Like relax, you got 2 great free games, and PES can be given away for free at any point in the future, and if not, who cares, the vast majority of soccer fans buy Fifa anyway.
PS3 games to avoid... what a well timed article.
Just in the nick of too late, when almost no one is even playing PS3 anymore.
Sure those people exist, but they probably know what they like and are replaying old games over and over.
How about PS4 games to avoid? I mean hello.
My redneck childhood has been reinvigorated by this game. A simulation Monster Truck game, friggin eh!
For those unaware, aggression in this case is being defined as just "not being a girl"
Male aggression is the only aggression that is demonized.
Female aggression takes the form of reputational bullying, modifying pictures of other girls online, so a girl being bullied goes home and it doesn't stop, it continues online and has led to the rates of major depressive episodes from teenage girls to increase 70% over the last 5 years.
...
Slavish, I haven't bought a CoD game since Black Ops 2, and before that it was CoD 4 Modern Warfare the original. I'm very selective about which ones I buy, the rest I just borrowed from friends. I was actually intrigued by the new engine and lack of season pass, but if it just means we have to pay for guns and maps individually I'll be pissed.
It's unclear whether they will simply charge for each DLC separately. A season pass means you get everything for one bundle price. If Activision simply says "yeah instead of getting all DLC for one bundle price you have to pay 15-20 bucks for each separately, since we can make more money that way" then I'm not buying this.
They made plenty of money before the days of loot boxes. Profits soar every year because they continually cut costs. EA are a bunch of greedy shits and can easily turn a profit loot boxes or not.
Apparently they hired nothing but technical designers and no actual "game design" person to make the game engaging, fun or worth playing.
They just need to hire someone to do proper game design. Destiny went through a ton of changes from the beginning to end of its life, so it's not an impossible task; this game needs a game design overhall from the ground up.
I can't believe Einhander hasn't been at least remastered or been given a sequel. It was an amazing shooter way ahead of its time on PS1 back in the day.