Clearly ESPN and Disney believe you are an exception.
ESPN is owned by Disney and has an audience mainly made up of older, more conservative middle Americans. It makes sense that the network's standards are going to be different from what we as gamers are used to. You can disagree with the policy but it isn't a crazy decision, and e-sports organizations will likely go along with it because of the increased mainstream exposure a network like ESPN can offer.
Man I wish I could be a highly paid research analyst and make money to say stuff everyone in gaming has known for thirty years.
What's the point of a hard "Game Over" in a game like Mario anyway? Do people really play Mario hoping to be significantly punished for failure?
Was it shockingly bad, or just shocking?
You're missing the point of the article. The author would agree that good writers can write characters of any races. The problem is that David Cage, a bad writer, can't do it because he is bad.
That quote, "David Cage, a white man, only understands how white men think" in context is saying that David Cage hasn't demonstrated any ability to write believable characters outside his limited perspective. The author isn't saying that a white man couldn't write non-white characters well or understand how other people think, he is saying that David Cage, specifically, can't do it.
This is such a chill and reasonable response you'll almost certainly be torn to shreds for it.
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it.
I've seen this opinion come up in a few different places online, but it's just very strange to me. VR and AR have so much in common (and so many developers are working on both platforms) that trying to portray them as rivals doesn't make a lot of sense.
Is there really a big difference between a VR app that can use inside-out tracking and cameras to incorporate real-world geometry and objects (something we're basically on the cusp of getting) and AR apps tha...
Have it?
Can you elaborate? The article's argument is that, from a business perspective, Sony has the least to gain from full cross-play, because it already has a much larger playerbase than the competing platforms.
What's your take?
The demands of VR versions of these titles and the regular versions aren't really comparable. Fallout 4 and Skyrim can run on a wide range of devices, but VR demands are significantly higher.
So far they've only said Fallout 4 VR will run on HTC Vive on the PC. Skyrim VR runs on PSVR though.
We tested it on both NVIDIA and AMD cards for the article.
This is an interesting take. Why do you think characters, specifically, should be free?
Being second to Mario Kart 8 is still pretty good.
The game is free to play if you have a PlayStation Plus subscription (which might be a warning sign, for a new game to be totally free right away) if you want to try it yourself.
Reviews always vary, but...seems like a lot of people really didn't like this game.
Yeah there are a ton of positive reviews out there.
Shadow of Mordor was great though. And Shadow of War looks like a lot of fun too. Seems a shame to avoid a good game because it's taking some liberties with Middle-earth mythology.