This game/app is great. I loved it from the beginning. Sony should make ps5 and psvr2 compatible version with shared content with ps4 users. Also I would love to pay for some good content. Sony should made it from beginning. It would encourage people to make more content..... I think :-)
I agree. Only thing is, totk vs botw differs much more than gow vs gowr. I played all of them and I love gow and gowr. But gowr seems to me like very very big dlc whereas totk is like new game despite it shares map and lot of assets.
More games on game pass -> more quantity -> less quality. Its inevitable.
Its Archero copy.
We are all doomed. In the end MS can buy everything. Everything will be on game pass. And there will be such low quality but huge quantity. Like in mobile gaming. I hope this will not be the case. But it seems inevitable.
Played game on 3DS. It was absolute blast!
Od course. Game pass prioritizes quantity over quality. It is seen also on some video streaming services. Its inevitable.
Its simple. When Sony will have game pass on Playstation, MS will release all games on it and phase out xbox.
So he is just liar. And I almost thought he is exception in business, who cares about customers.
So, he would not pay for one year exclusivity on xbox. Thats not ok.
But it is ok to buy whole publisher and make game lifetime exclusivity.
ohhhh...I understand now :-)
This or other way, I understand some exclusivity. For me it is ok, if MS or Sony pays developer for exclusivity and helps them with finance. It is also ok to buy smaller developers, that have some sort of affinity to MS or Sony. What Im not friend of is buying whole publishers or developers simply f...
Its interesting. Because Phil told us, that it makes definitely sense to release games also on PS for:
1)more gamers can play them
2)they can sell millions of copies on Playstation
So it seems Phil is really desperate, that they need to try to weaken playstation brand.
I think problem isnt in exclusivity of one title. But Exclusivity of IP or whole publisher. From MS this is really desperate move. Not illogical. They need really big aquisitions to be able to profit from game pass. But buying Zenimax or Activision-Blizzard with potential exclusivity can harm competitive market.
But Anyway. If there was b/c , preorders would be much higher.
Plus: until dawn rush of blood, vr worlds (or new one), dick wilde 1,2 , Moss 1,2
These are games I like to come back to. There are more of course and also games I didnt played yet and waited for PSVR2. For me, incompatibility is huge drawback. So big, Im considering whether to buy PSVR2 or not. Maybe few years later.
But luckily for devs, this is good for them. They get extra cash for development and can publish the game on xbox later to make even more money. Its bad only for xbox only gamers. On the other hand gamepass - like many "as a service" things - is not so good for quality developers. It is best for quick content. And also for marketing small devs of course. I would rather see timed exclusivity for Sony and Microsoft either than any form od Pass.
I dont believe MS even "nose between eyes". Phil does so much friendly talk. And he is so nice guy. But in reality, MS tries to lock majority of market to themselves. Of course Sony tried similar thing in past. All companies try. But that cant be excuse for nowadays behaviour. And I really dont understand, how anyone can vouch for that. People only see "oooo, I will have everything on gamepass day one"...but when MS will have biggest leverage, all will change. It always ch...
Sony doesnt do it for being nice :-)
If it will be possible to use it also on PC...I will be glad...after that disaster when absence of backward compatibility was announced :-(
Thats a pitty! I hoped I will go through some of them on PSVR2. So large library! It would definitely look better on PSVR2.
Wwwwait. Phil said, he want bring games to more people.... Oh, he lied.....