Had they given it a more open, quest-based stage design like Nier, deepening the lore, then they could've extended it further. Getting it nonetheless.
But is the game any good?
I love seeing the progression over the lifecycle of the game, as well as the evolution of the skill level of the community over time. Definitely a day 1 buy for me....which I never do for an MK game.
Very true. I love fighting games, don't care for MK, but acknowledge it is a supreme package, legit fighter and high quality product.
Literally synonymous.
Yes they do.
You forget.....there are people who play 3 out of the top 5 literally just for the story. I never did GTA, RDR, TLOU or UC multiplayer but loved everyone of them.
How about a PC port of the 1st Gears that actually works? 2 and 3 on PC would be nice too.
This is literally the only MS exclusive series I'm trying to get into.
And thats exactly what they are doing. The countering system and stages in DOA always made it the most epic. Time to just start evolving it for more mainstream visual appeal.
From the looks of it, thats not what they're offering here. Such a shame because I'd prefer that too.
Just bought a 1080 ti as my first ever GPU after 30 years of console gaming. Don't see myself needing more than this for a long while, esp considering I'm mainly a single-player gamer.
My bad. I meant good ones. lol.
And here I thought it was gonna start with games. lmao.
Only 3gb of recommended VRAM for 4K?
Does that sound right?
MY man!
More leaps in graphics with barely any fun games to showcase them? Again?
Sure, why not.
I don't care about what's under the hood. If there are no cool looking games then it's a wash.
It should be able to compete with the likes of DMC and other hack & slash greats. Esp considering that dev knows how to make amazing fighting game mechanics.
I'll admit III was trash but Sigma was dope and II wasnt bad.
No Adam Hunter?
Wait, I'm confused.....isnt this at like a 91 on Metacritic?