It's not that everybody is good but that the game got too easy. But I can't prove it since I can't play like a noob and test it myself. It's (MW3) much easier than MW2 and COD4 though.
Why would you play an offline multiplayer game? Don't they have story-driven games elsewhere? Where the story is actually good and doesn't try to use the "Wow" factor with Michael Bay directing?
Doesn't IGN get paid for their reviews? I think that would explain the inconsistencies.
I seriously doubt it's a RAM problem.
Wow. You bring in Nintendo here?
Although I feel for the Aussies, that title is funny to me. "Outback Storm". Hehe
The payed weapons aren't that as good as you think. Sure, they have ups and downs, but they're the same, if not worse, than the normal guns. I mean, the M16A3 is pretty much an awesome gun right now. so is the M98. So is the M4A1 Carbine. So is the RPK/Whatever the other one was.
You seriously called everyone here street retarded?
Interestinger and interestinger...
Not really. Stuff in Japan is always more expensive than stuff here (America/Europe w/e)
I don't think it's that. I think it's the contract behind COD and Acti.
EA?
When did you hear that? The only thing I didn't know about was Aftermath.
Rocket batteries...
sllpasdasdsssssssssssslurpslu pslrupdribble
SHHH! Don't tell him.
u sure?
Life is but filled with greed. And then it's concentrated into industry. Such as gaming and the like. As long as you get something in return, I find greed to be a good thing.
I hear it's a one time fee. So, not bad.
'tis the truth, sir.
@younglj01
The lowered amount of destruction wasn't to lower strain. DICE even said that it was because in BC2, jerks would just tank snipe the whole match and destroy everything, making it impossible for defenders to defend/attackers to attack.
"Their (THERE) are games that run 32+ players are better and they don't seem too have any limitations.I'm just saying with an improved so-called next gen engine that you can't even too try too pul...