...but it wasn't a port, it was developed simultaneously for PC and 360 and actually the PS3 version is a port. Because of Blu and more powerful hardware, a polished port ;-)
Any facts to back your claims up? This game was running on a PC that simulated the PS3. Funny how MS fanboys always try to turn rumours into facts lol
...with the better graphics, more quests and without framerate issues and pop ups ;-)
If the 360 would be capable of better graphics, Bethesda would surely release an update. Fact is 360 barerely handled this game and Bethesda gave hell to release a patch that helped a little with the framerate and pop ups.
...I'm not happy this game comes to the PS3, I'm just stating the sad truth. If I would have any interest in this game, I would get it for PC ;-)
Twice the size but half the price, thanks Sony !!!
...but fact is, 360 already had strong performance issues with the version it got and Bethesda gave hell to reduce the isses a little. If Oblivion with improved graphics would be possible on 360, you would surely get it with a patch ;-)
No thanks, besides that I don't see any games that interest me and which I can't get on PC, I also don't like to get ripped off. $99 for a cheap 20GB HDD? No thanks, MS. $99 for Wi-Fi? No thanks, MS. Additional hardware for charging? No thanks, MS. $199 for a HD-DVD addon that I can only use for a limited time, cause it's without HDMI? No thanks, MS. $598 for a console with a limited HD movie playback without HDMI, Wi-Fi and only a 20GB HDD? No thanks, MS.
Xbox 360 is not a good deal i...
...isn't it? ROFLMFAO
BTW your are a MS drone that loves to get milked and posts some ridiculous stuff without backing anything up. ROFLMFAO
"The big question on my mind going into TGS was PS3. I was hoping to go to the show and see stuff that would demonstrate why I'd spend an extra $200 on a console...and I did. Virtua Fighter 5, White Knight Story, and especially MotorStorm (OMG) were well beyond anything I've seen on the 360. I don't know if you can really tell from the videos we posted, but MotorStorm is just so damn impressive. Every once in a while I'll see a game and just take a step back and think to myself how far t...
Toy Story graphics
"we don't want to dissapoint gamers"
1080p native
HD-DVD included
$99 20GB HDD
$99 Wi-Fi
$199 HDD without HDMI
MS anyone?
ROFLMFAO
You proved your point? With what? Any facts to back your claims up? Who was the one that backed it up who's ripping who? ROFLMFAO
...your a mindless MS drone that loves to get milked lol
You must be kidding, xboxfanboys like to cry PS3 is way too expensive, but in fact it's very cheap for the things it offers, much cheaper than the 360. Let's see what Xbox360 would cost if it would only offer just the not so future proof HD movie playback:
$399 Xbox360 premium + $199 HD-DVD addon = $598
Almoust the price of the future proof 60GB PS3. Xbox 360 sadly still lacks Wi-Fi, HDMI and offers only a 20GB HDD.
If you don't care about Wi-Fi you can buy t...
...according to IGN and other sites 360 got owned. Funny how xboxfanboys say this sites are biased, but when there is 1 site that states otherwise, it's the truth.
An xbox game din't come on top of a japanese show, it came on top of this site's rating ;-)
...a pure 360 fanboy. They always post ridiculous rumours just to make the PS3 look bad. 2.8 ghz Cell anyone?
----------------------------- -------------------
Twice the size but half the price, thanks Sony !!!
...this game makes all 360 games look like a pile a crap ;-)
LOL Wang like any who knows tech, states the simple truth. You won't find any credible source that agrees with MS analysis even IGN didn't wanna have anything to do with it. Even trying to sell somebody, an analysis made by MS, is the truth, the unbiased truth, is simple ridiculous. You call me noob for agreeing with Wang, a man that has nothing to do with Sony/MS but in the same time you are ageeing with an analysis created by a company that developed 360 LOL that's just too funny. This anal...
"Before arriving at TGS, we would have given the Xbox 360 the nod in terms of the next-generation hardware battle. Sony has made a series of blunders in the last six months, and from what we saw and heard about prior to the show, developers were having a lot of trouble developing for the PS3 hardware compared to the ease of PC-like Xbox 360 programming. Plus, side by side, 360 and PS3 games looked almost indistinguishable in terms of graphics.
But at TGS and the following spec...
...360 failures are under 3% and not higher than usual. Now it looks they simply lied and played their little hidden agenda:
"As we discussed, we do not have a single launch unit that still works, and have long wondered how Microsoft could be ignoring the issue of 360 hardware failure in the face of an epidemic of failure."
http://gear.ign.com/article...
LOL this says all, it...
He surely is talkin about the MS comarison IGN posted. This comparison is only party right and there are some really ridiculous lies in it. Adding the bandwidth is the most ridiculous thing in this analysis and MS can only sell such lies to Xboxfanboys that don't have any clue about technology.
You wanted a link? Here is one:
http://www.atomicmpc.com.au...
Ms are j...
I'm stunned, this 1st gen game easily blows any 360 game.
You must be kidding talkin about some framerate issues and some pop ups. Let's not forget this is an unfinished product and the framerate is mostly smooth, the problems ain't even worth mentioning. Same goes for the pop ups,there were only very few. This games look simple spectacular and it's nice too see that PS3 handels it almoust without any problems.
Xboxfanboys have forgotten how Oblivion, an finished game performs o...
Maybe cause some of the devs made a call and said:
"Uhhmmmm well...360 is capable of native 1080p...but...such games run 15fps...and...need at least 3 discs...sorry for that...we give our best...but...that just ain't enough...we can't do wonders with the 360 hardware...and the sad truth is 360 can't handle it"
ROFLMFAO
...but over 9GB ;-) It has nothing to do with the 7 months extra developing time. I remember MS fanboys claiming how hard PS3 is to develope or port for, so if this would be the case, just the porting would take 7 months if not longer. Let's also not forget that Bethesda could easily update the 360 version with a patch, but there is none, cause it's impossible, simple as that. 360 already barely handles the inferior version.
GTA was always released 1 year later on Xbox, do you think th...