taht's all fine and dandy but not necessarily accurate. you're forgetting that 99% of the people that actually buy this service are in it for the DLC, and that's factual evidence, ask anyone; that's also why teh hardened edition is outselling the normal one. so once again this is polarizing the gaming community and soon enough after elite works wonders you'll see a trend and the casual market will once again fuck up gaming for the rest of us who actually cared about it. ...
naruto, every time i see you it's ignorance form ur mouth lol. i'm with hicken i'm a hardcore fan of lots of games and YET i've NEVER paid for anything that didn't come wiht my disc. certainly there were times that i wanted to like dead space 2's extra SP game and ACB's davinci campaign BUT no way in hell will i EVER support a company after i bought their product. monthly services are bullshit and all DLC is bascilaly that--wanna extend ur game and play with fri...
yeah i was thinking the same thing just so i could try the new maps since i've played a dlc map before.
i read that the reason they're releasing metro again is because they made a lot of changes and wanted to test it out. that's what a beta is for people. personally i'm glad they're doing that cuz who the fuck wants a demo of a game they're going to buy anyway? i'd rather a beta be an actual beta. that said who says they can't just add or change the map after a week of testing or what-have-you?
first in what series are you talking about? battlefield? every battlefield has big player counts aside form the console crap that was the bad company games in my honest opinoin 2 of those was too many and i hope to god they never release another bad company.
well i do hope you're right since i opted for the PS3 version over the PC version of Rage but i must say all the footage i've seen so far of the xbox version looks mighty fine and i haven't seen any ps3 footage yet but maybe i just dont' know where to look. if you know where please message me. thanks.
really though all you need to do is spend some money on a videocard and bump up your ram and you can have the same "top-tier" experience with almost any decent gaming PC. for the price of roughly 300.00 i bet you could manage if you tried newegg.
i really liked the honesty of the author. i jsut wish he had posted some videos comparing the three so we could judge for ourself but nonetheless i'm hoping all issues are resolved before or during our beta/demo :) whatever developers are calling it these days lol. thanks again to the author for the nice, subtle analysises--not sure if i said that right haha.
holy crap! there are ppl that like to win and don't just spawn trap for kills!? really!? i need to add and ONLY play with you guys lol. ps3 or pc which system for cod 4 or mw2 and battlefield games? that said if you still play counterstrike source i'm down for that as well.
brilliant. wish they did this with ALL games to deter these kids from their early youtubes and smacktalk videos.
okay then i'll just reply to my own comment. i dont' consider either bad company game to be a battlefield game; they were just console POS's made from bf2 an actually good game. that said yes it's mw2.5 not that i mind that becaue i i loved spec ops from mw2 however cod needs to be cod4.5 if they're going to reboot this franchise and get it's fans back. again u are ignorant, kid and i'm no fanboy since i like bf2 and cod4 and as well as counterstrike not too men...
word, son you know how life is
i playd both but r3 is more my cup of tea cuz i like fps over tps if it's just cover-to-cover like gears. that said gears looks great, was fun, and the AI was impressive, but just not for me that said i only spent about 1.5 hours with it and that was more than enough so there really isn't much variety in that style of game....however there isn't mcuh variety in most fps games but r3 has it. one minute you feel like a one-man army, the next you're working with AI teammates or...
LOTS of ppl LOVE MAG fyi and even more so than socom4
sure guy...i haven't played teh other games due to the piss-poor control schemes from earlier sony games such as killzone 2 even though i got over it with that game cuz it was great...but back on topic r3 is a great mix of survival horror and that halo feeling we all used to get before the story went crap. multiplayer wise is a nice touch but halo reach and for that matter halo 3 is better MP wise however the campaigns of both of those games don't touch R3 i'm sorry. again my op...
YESSIR you got it. go back to balance by throwing out EVERYTHING that was in mw2 and i mean EVERYTHING. i just waant an update to cod4 for catching hackers, new server lists, and most importantly new maps. that's all codmw3 needs to be successful. listen to teh fans and go back to cod4 and that's all. none of this noob instakill bullshit. wait one problem ith cod4 the melee system not nearly as broken as the other games but due away wiht one-hit melee kills too
lies cod4 is way different than mw2 and also waaaay better lol
well now i'm going to have to disagree with this point namely cuz you chose assassin's creed 2 as an example of game that wasn't really changed. ur mad. ac2 was a HUGE difference form the first and the only reason why i got into the series. it was an excellent game that constantly brought variation where as the first was just constant repetition.
td!? as in team deathmatch!? get the fuck outta here. this is battlefield as in objective modes learn to play conquest noob. secondly, why does mw3 need a beta? if you've played mw2 you've played mw2.5 err sorry mw3.
ooh well thanks for replying. i do not know of such things since i still haven't touched the game but maybe if they released a different mode or metro or something might help leviate the problem? that said i never base the decision to buy a game on a demo. i prefer SP over MP usually anyway. i have counterstriek if i need my MP fix otehrwise on my console it's all abotu singleplayer experiences that i can enjoy and battlefield 3 i'm most excited about is the campaign since the...