no offense, but halo hasnt been shown since 2015, gears since 2016.
@saijhn
You need Xbox live to play Microsoft exclusives online, even on PC
So what they are saying is in a nutshell
"We are going to carry on doing what we have been doing for years"
@brazz
a AAA game does not need to be tecnologically advanced in any way. the term AAA is to do with budget size. (amount of funding for said game).
Doesnt need to look good, play good, sell good. If its got a high budget, its AAA. That simple
dont rule out Battlefield sunshine. They already have the player count and map size for a BR mode.
They have dedicated servers which i highly doubt Activision will fork out for. COD BR will be P2P with host migration on death, you watch, you heard it here first.
@tyler
Battlefield has been doing 64 players for years!! but COD's getting praised for "possibly" doing 60-75?
Enjoy the lag compensation in COD BR, and wait till they decide to close the skill gap as per.
Errr no, just no, how can you do better than a free to play battle royale game when your charging £50 for yours???
i know right!! i blame Monday
My bad, thought it was an article about GOW sales figures not a chart.
Game is doing well though to be fair.
Because if they did MW2/MW3 back compat, no one would buy the new ones.
I dont agree.
I bought an xbox one x on day one, and still to this date i dont question myself why i bought one. I get enhanced games, a 4K Blu-ray player (£250-350) minimum for a half decent one standalone, as well as my back catalogue of games from the xb360.
For £450 big ones, no brainer
true achievements only tracks data on registered accounts, so to assume no one plays single player campaigns is reaching at best
is the battle royale mode P2P hosting? I'm fully expecting it to be some laggy, bad hit detection standard COD.
its not dead on xbox, its a new game for us !!!!
errr no. Not to get too the ending and think "i cant wait for whats next!!!"
Bioware - "Buy this novel to find out what happens!!"
play that then?
maybe the same reason Sony fans are bashing the game?
He might have personally enjoyed the game, in which case his score is correct.
Dont get angry, just remember its his opinion.
I though Sony were funding this as an exclusive?
Cosmetic only you say? What about getting rid of season pass and going with tides of war, where you pay for a pass for limited time content?
I'd take microtransactions any day over paying for a service and not owning the content