Not a chance, OnLive sucks.
Cos Microsoft are crap at making hardware. They coudn't get a home console to work properly. What chance would they have at something like a handheld.
What a complete joke.
It's a joke, an after thought.
OnLive sucks, both MS and Sony could do a better job. Why would they need dated tech when ther's will be newer. Going with Onlive would be pointless.
lol, Kinect sucks.
Why update home you say?
Why not, it's makes income for Sony, which pays for PSN.
What utter crap.
PS3/PS Vita combo can do what Wii U can do anywhere, Wii U is tethered to just inside your home. Which is very limiting, even PSP did remote play anywhere, Wii U is clearly a step backwards.
Ofcource importing costly.
For starters. Vita services arn't forced to work anywhere but Japan.
@mcstorm - Japan was hit by an earthquake, that screwed up Sony manafacturing for it's products. If Sony could of got manafacturing and parts for Vita, Sony would of released it no doubt.
Edge reviewers are total morons
NFS: The Run is easily a 8/10
@gamingdroid - memory card is not a requirement for all games, as PS Vita games hav a writeable part of the Game card thats used for game saves/dlc.
Lol, Kinect a joke.
make players look like retards
Onlive sucks.
Question should be, 'do we need more of these pointless articles asking this question'
Someone clearly doesn't know ther tech shit.
Cell CPU is based off PowerPC 6 as is 360 3 core CPU.
Wii U CPU Still based off PowerPC just it's uses version 7 rather than 6.
Sony don't set PSN prices, the Publisher does.
Also who ever pays full retail RRP for games. I never do.
This is bullshit PS3 can remote play PSP/Vita games. So ther is no need to copy games at all.
Go the hole hog and hav Sony to make it.
Least the hardware would work and be reliable from the off.
@waseem335 - less than 1% YLOD vs 65% RROD
Sony has many 1st party Studio's. They just split resources between all ther PLAYSTATION platforms.
Taken the lead in making gamers look like retards. lol