But I really don't feel like any of them look good.
Most of the textures look flat...except for the character models which I will admit look pretty good.
But then again, Call of Duty has always looked it's best when moving.
They are screen captures. Not off screen.
This means that the image is taken before it gets to the Tv. Straight from the source. This is the native signal, showing you exactly what it will look like before the tv gets ahold of it.
The better contrast you're seeing on the pc version is due to better textures, and higher resolution.
You really believe all that shovel crap Sony Feeds you?
A modern Pc destroys the Playstation 3, and the 360. Not even a chance!
If anything, these shots will not do the game justice on the pc, because they are not running at it's max resolution. Way above 1080p, I promise you that.
And they don't seem to have any sort of multi sampled AA applied.
Trust me. I promise you! If you want the best visuals...you need a Pc.
You only play exclusives?
You're missing out bud...
Owns killzone.
So don't even start that.
For a PC game, this looks like trash.
But then again, they REALLY scaled back the resolution for this comparison.
But the shadows, and shaders look terrible (for a pc game).
Still better than the PS3...but geeze guys. A little effort.
Whoever disagrees has never played a pc game.
I would like to see the honest comparison instead of scaling back the pc version to give PS3 a chance.
1920x1080 at 4xaa or 8xaa (PC)
vs the 1024x600 at 2xaa (PS3)
and I would like to see the video too, showing frame rates.
120+ fps (pc) vs 30fps, or maybe 60? (PS3).
I was all pumped up about infamous when it was coming out. Somehow I had forgotten about it.
I need to give it a go. I'm glad this article popped up, I'd totally forgot!
But then again I like linear games.
More story driven, and the action is carefully crafted and focused to give the most cinematic experience possible.
Not to mention typically better visuals.
"All I see is a desperate attempt to be Uncharted."
Huh? What? Really?!
All I see is a desperate attempt to compare two totally different games by an upset Sony fanboy.
Did you even watch the video?
Where does he jump across massive gaps, climb buildings and single handedly take out a tank? I think I missed that....
I could have sworn that this was a horror game.
All fanboys are blind and totally delusional. Proof is in the quote.
Looks fantastic! I can't wait. I really like the concept. Looks well directed. Great visuals too.
second that notion.
Has nothing to do with a game engine...or performance.
It's just storage guys. Not another video card...
But it is very nice storage.
Word.
Think this is very very impressive.
Benchmarks always push the envelope.
Games when optimized for the hardware will run better, and look better. I'm excited.
Like GOW2 is faster paced...
but then again I always play Anex and King of the HIll, which has respawns.
Gears of War.
It's still top dog in my books. It's the only online I play on the 360.
This game needs something...
artistic ability!
The textures are not well done in my opinion.
The Wii can outperform the DS.
What game I would give game of the year.
Nothing out there that's crazy innovative. Just more squeals. Sure they'll be fun...but I think game of the year needs to do something different.
I would probably say uncharted will get it...just because the cinematic feel and visuals... But then again...Modern Warfare has had it's gameplay nailed for a while now...
But Batman seems to most original...
Good thing it's not my call.