ARMS, Splatoon 2, Xenoblade 2 and Mario & Rabbids Kingdom Battle all came out on the Switch's first year and range from good to great games. On top of that you can't ignore the stupid amount of indies it got, which are no-brainers to play on the Switch, and some of them great and exclusive like Golf Story and FAST RMX.
Switch's first year was superb for Switch owners, we had plenty to play every month. In comparison, this year was pretty bad, at least on the...
Handhelds are consoles. You meant home consoles especifically.
Even that is too optimistic, I think. RDR2 is really massive, much harder to downgrade than Doom or Wolfenstein 2. It would be more like dynamic resolution (constantly dipping to sub-720p), low settings, and 30 fps with occasional frame drops at best, severe drops at worst.
The thing is, the Switch's online infrastructure is worse than what the PS3 had when it came out, which was in 2006... 12 years ago. Not "a few years back" like you said.
So yeah, Nintendo may up their game when it comes to online... but they are so ridiculously behind the times it's pathetic. You can't compare this with the PS3 situation at all.
Nah, it would have the graphics of the first Red Dead Redemption.
Nope, this is worse than Wii U's Smash. Although nowhere near as bad as Brawl, which was simply unplayable.
This article is completely risible. Not only is the netcode absolute shit, the way everything is programmed is shit, too. Nintendo just hasn't got a clue when it comes to online play. I can enjoy to an extent what little there is to offer in the online department (still better than no online at all, I guess)... but this doesn't come anywhere close to what ...
You're trying too hard.
A lot of people are having issues playing Ultimate's online mode, myself included. I got hit by really hard lag spikes all the time, where the game completely freezes for seconds at a time. This doesn't happen to me on any other game, including Nintendo Switch games (Splatoon 2, Paladins).
Besides that, the actual modes on the game suck. Smash for Wii U did it better with the "For Fun" and "For Glory"...
Only pre-recorded presentations. And the biggest floor space on the show along with Sony. And the Treehouse live presentations, which were every day at E3, and used to showcase new games, and even announce new stuff.
Nintendo never left E3.
Jade Raymond hasn't worked at EA for years. She joined Ubisoft 14 years ago and has been there since. She's the founder and head at Ubisoft Toronto. And Ubisoft has plenty of single player games...
Yeah, no. I have both games, and this is not a remake or a port.
The Wii U version was already 1080p and ran at 60fps. The Switch version overall looks slightly better, with improved textures, colors, and nicer character models, although I think a couple characters looked better on the Wii U version (Donkey Kong and Kirby). But yeah, I've played a bit of Ultimate since release, and it looks lovely. Got 55 characters unlocked so far, I think I have 19 to go. :D
Nice try, troll. Facts say otherwise, though.
0/10.
I'm not agreeing with the other dude, because I think Ninty's announcements were cool, but nothing really major (though we gotta watch out for that exclusive Marvel Ultimate Alliance game, it could be a hit if made well and marketed well)... but come on, bro. The main reason most of us watch the Game Awards is the new game announcements, not the awards themselves.
dotwithshoes: they will make it work somehow. They probably will change the lore to explain the sudden introduction of mutants in some other way. But yeah, what I do not see happening is Marvel Studios not using it. It's way too much money to ignore.
Exactly. You can't be fine with Spiderman being exclusive to Playstation and then bitch when another Marvel property becomes exclusive to another platform. I bet if this game was announced as a PS4 exclusive he wouldn't be crying like this. Hypocrite.
Care to explain what you're trying to say? You're not making any sense for me.
Where is this betrayal you're talking about? Who betrayed who? Spiderman sold millions on the PS4, and it's exclusive to the platform, but do you really think it couldn't have sold even better if it was made just the same, but multiplatform? How come you are fine with Sony getting a Spiderman exclusive game, but a Marvel UA game being exclusive to Nintendo is suddenly a betray...
License rules are different for videogames than they are for movies. Two completely different worlds.
Not that it matters too much, though. With Disney's acquisition of Fox, the X-Men coming into the Marvel Cinematic Universe is now a matter of when, not if.
Are you asking how this makes sense on a game that has Solid Snake, Wii Fit Trainer and Piranha Plant?
XD
In your opinion. In mine, this show was packed with cool stuff.
Expecting the Switch to sell just as well as the 3DS and Wii U combined in order to be considered a success just because the Switch is a portable-home console hybrid is a fallacious conclusion. You need to factor in a lot of other things, like the fact that the Switch's price is far more expensive than the 3DS', which means that sales expectation should be lower than the 3DS', but higher than the Wii U's (which was similarly priced and is clearly an inferior product). The logi...