*Insert hate comment about EA*
Personally, I think he's a fairly decent monster. He plays off our fear of the unknown and is a an inescapable predator, which plays on our fear of the unchangeable.
However, compared to other monsters, he's extremely unorthodox.
You know they would.
Far too many human enemies? Now granted, it shouldn't have had any, but an extremely small fraction of the game was human enemies.
Nothing better than reviews in progress.
/s
This change could actually be a good one. EA has done a great job with Battlefield, Crysis, Sims, and Need for Speed. Maybe new management would help them avoid blunders and unnecessary hatred.
If they want to improve it, listen to the fanbase and don't advertise the game as an action game. That's hardly a way to gain new customers and it sure as hell won't attract old ones.
My body is ready.
Compared to waiting years for it, waiting a few days to get it fixed doesn't seem as bad by comparison. (I'm in no way justifying EA messing it up in the first place)
Two things wrong with this article:
1. PETA
2. Kotaku
"Completely"? That's not entirely accurate. I found myself enjoying it.
Actually, I don't think they introduced more action. I think they just advertised specifically action. As for gameplay? They perfected the action and only subject you to small doses of humans/hi-action environments.
I think they gameplay speaks for itself.
So let me get this straight. It's a good thing a franchise is experiencing trouble because EA funded it and EA is the root of all evil?
And I'm sure PETA would have had a fit with all the hunting in AC3.
It's great that people of all ages can play games suited to them. However, I found myself very concerned for her health..
I'm just sitting in the back, watching all these comment wars go on, when I can't but think this thought: "We're all gamers. So, rather than being dedicated to a specific brand, can't we just sit back knowing that, in the end, both Microsoft (without the dollar sign) and Sony will bend over backwards for the gamer?"
I think both companies will have a small focus on motion-gameplay, but this won't be the main focus on either company.
I'm curious why there's such a big deal about them not showing the console yet. If anyone has some legitimate concerns about it, I'd like to know why.
They did not block used games, therefore, a physical copy of PS4 games will exist. Gamestop banks off of this existence by buying low and selling high.
Therefore, Sony is not causing Gamestop's extinction.
1) Better specs than Sony.
2) New IPs
3) Focus on hardcore gamers
4) Free online
5) Used games aren't blocked
It says it requires a password. Know what the password is?