PC and 360 both have similar features through Vista and MS made it to be that way. PS3 has less limited online capabilities than the 360 so its not a matter of PS3 can't do it, but that it would be unfair to players. Besides, XBL doesn't even allow you all the freedoms online that the PS3 has and the PSN doesn't even cost a penny.
Get over yourself you have two exclusive studios and Walmart won't even carry your players. You lost so deal with it and do everyone a favor and sell that piece of sh*t HD-DVD player and buy yourself a nice Blu-Ray Player this Christmas.
This game doesn't bring anything revolutionary to the table. You all will be bored in about five or six months, which I admit isn't bad for a game. Actually its pretty good.
Marionz, Killzone for PS3 hasn't even been released yet and you are already saying it sucks. Oh, and if your Halo is so great, why aren't you playing it?
Such a sad future ahead for Xbots and the only people who took the time to respond are the ones who took it personal so marionz and sticky, don't act like you two aren't Xbots.
It was a joke. Go ahead and report me though its not a big deal, it just goes to show you don't have a sense of humor. I can survive a few months without N4G. And toughNAME I'm sorry if that in anyway offended you, it wasn't meant that way, it was just a joke.
I actually laughed when 1.2 said something about the USA being the richest nation in the world. Here kiddies, study this website before you say anything ignorant that hurts our already craptastic image around the world.
https://www.cia.gov/library...
h...
Let me just remind everyone real quick that the first (and best) Halo scored an average 97/100 on metacritic, Halo 2 scored 95/100, and my guess is we'll see Halo 3 down at 93 or 92. So in that respect, Halo 3 can be as comparably good as Virtua Tennis: Sega Professional Tennis for the Dreamcast which has a 92/100.
I said this game wasn't going to be a crapfest, but it wouldn't deserve its rightful place as the end to a classic trilogy. You think Bungie cares about being original and creative now? Na, I bet as I'm typing this some of you are waiting in line to buy their half-***ed money making cow that is sure to buy all the developers that nice Yacht. You decide the quality of games, not them.
Your mom averages about an 8.9
An 8.9 is a wonderful score for your average everyday game, bu this is a Halo game. This is suppose to be the Jesus, Buddha, and Mohamed sandwich of gaming. 8.9 is good, but not for Halo.
Suddenly when Halo 3 is subject to bad reviews, every Xbot comes out and suddenly bad reviews don't have anything to do with a AAA standing. Hypocrites.
Halo: Combat Evolved was a truly innovative FPS for a console in dire need of a decent game. Halo 2 brought Halo's awesome multiplayer into Xbox Live and that made it a refreshing change from Halo. I'll admit it and many others will admit it too that the primary reason for being hyped over Halo 2 was its online features.
Now here we are with Halo 3, but can anybody tell me what is so innovating and/or refreshing about it that would match its predecessors? I'm sorry, but new weapons, m...
Who thinks Microsoft is innocent and NEVER influences their public relations (i.e. reviews, commercials, wikipedia, blogs, forums) is an idiot with no understanding of business. Sony is guilty of the same practices, but Microsoft is especially known for playing dirty (thats how it was founded).
This game looks like crap. Compared to the graphics of other FPS and the fact that developers have been shoving WWII titles up our ***es for years I expected a lot better.
Even Piccolo or Yamcha could rip that little ninja bitc*es head off.
Your mom
Bungie did claim they used the in-game engine for this trailer so...pfffffft jog on.
Mario can suck a **** and shove it up Luigi's Italian ***.
They only give you a certain amount of time, or you complete the demo so I can see why one of the codec scenes would be frustrating.