datriax

Member
CRank: 5Score: 10540

Huh. Who knew a re-skin of their hilariously crappy Division, wouldn't be so well received?

3243d ago 9 agree17 disagreeView comment

Comical, and depressing, to see the slew of morons in this comment section, touting this as something good.

Unf**kin-believable how stupid so many people are these days.

3244d ago 17 agree2 disagreeView comment

Denuvo is hardly the boogeyman it used to be. So what if the crack takes a week or a month.

I'll still never buy a game that has to phone home, in turn, giving it an expiration date. Yes, that includes online multiplayer only games as well.

3244d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

What? How did it beat that stiff competition like............ or................. or even..................... oh right. There is no competition.

3244d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

Maybe try not lying next time. It tends to curb people's expectations.

Hopefully you go bankrupt and end up serving coffee at a pub for the next couple years. Maybe make you appreciate your opportunities more.

3244d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

If someone has to explain how something enhances the story? It's highly likely, that it's not enhancing jack s**t.

So tired of these stupid self felatiating claims by these types of idiots. If you love your own crappy game, go molest it in private.

3245d ago 10 agree11 disagreeView comment

Who gives a s**t if it plays roms from 20+ year old games anyways? Seriously. This "piracy" card is so old and tired when it comes to old school retrro emulation.

I think those companies have had more than enough time to make whatever money they were going to make on those games.

This whole "create a game and make money on it for the rest of time" crap, is just idiotic.

3245d ago 5 agree0 disagreeView comment

Anyone who buys this garbage and even remotely promotes more of this shovelware to be made in the future, should be outlawed from ever spending money without someone of adequate IQ present.

A license to spend your money. Yes. We are in the days of that almost being a requirement.

3246d ago 7 agree1 disagreeView comment

Who would invest even another penny, in to a franchise that has basically been left to the crows by the galactically stupid SquareEnix? It's comical that they even shovel this garbage out after they ruined this game with their stupid marketing, business decisions, and downright greed.

3248d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Sounds good. Here's hoping it goes through.

3251d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Make a real Resident Evil while you're at it. I know it's asking a lot of the inept staff left working at Capcom these days, but..... give it a try at least.

3253d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

His face alone deserves twice the hate, and many, many, many haymakers. Never seen anyone I've wanted to drop an anvil on more than this worthless pile of skin.

3255d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Let me know when he "officially" leaves the planet. I've got a special bottle of champagne awaiting the moment.

3259d ago 8 agree32 disagreeView comment

How many times does history have to repeat itself, before people develop any foresight whatsoever? This thing is another Nintendo project, botched by their comical levels of arrogance. Nothing new here.

For some stupid reason they insist on continuing with their prehistoric methods of thinking and business. No problem. Nobody has infinite pockets. Each failed product they release is another step towards their demise as a hardware maker. Given what we've seen fr...

3259d ago 8 agree9 disagreeView comment

No DLC should be paid. Either support your product for extended time, or don't. "DLC" was always released either as a free download, or in an update patch back in the early days of the internet. That's when gaming was far less popular.

If they could take the time and money to make it free back then, when the customer base was 1/5 what it is today? I'm pretty sure they could do the same today. Too many brainless morons out there to milk for mo...

3260d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nah, actually it's not. Neither is any game with a "pay now, pay more later" approach. F**k off with these stupid articles trying to praise this garbage.

3261d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

Let's see.... because local processing and rendering will never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever be outdone by cloud based processing and rendering delivered over a compressed and artifacted stream? I think so.

Hardware engineers continuously work on reducing local processing latency, much less magnifying those numbers by great factors by having it stream through video over the net.

Whoever thinks streaming games from some rando...

3261d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

Given that those game segments are super imposed on the video, and not actually running on the Switch? Ya, plenty of reason to worry. Nintendo was likely too embarrassed to showcase what they actually look like in motion.

3262d ago 3 agree9 disagreeView comment

It looks like crap because it's on a Nintendo system.

3262d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment

Let's see. A perfectly capable game console in the PS4, or a hilariously weak toaster in the Switch. If you have trouble choosing, you may want to have your head examined by a medical professional.

3262d ago 7 agree9 disagreeView comment