$299 for a system with a built in blu ray player and wifi and 120gb hd? Isn't that cheaper than the elite, which has none of that?
Obviously they will be, this has already been announced months ago. I doubt they will announce any new classes, last thing I read, one of them they had no art for and were just playing with skills and using placeholder art from an NPC, and the other they were still designing on paper. They could introduce the one that is further along if they have designed art for it by now but the one on paper, they don't even know what the class is going to be yet. This game is still a lonnnnng way out, 201...
Who said anything about 2 story houses? I live in an apartment, and my computer is too far away from the couch to sit on it and play games on my PC.
I never said it was wrong, I'm just saying I doubt it will stop anyone from getting the game.
I very much doubt it. They make mistakes like this all the time on game websites. I don't see them not releasing a huge multiplatform game on PS3, but I'll get it for PC if it's not. Either way I wouldn't be too worried. It's a new IP that no one has seen anything from. Microsoft doesn't risk spending a ton of money on something that hasn't proven that it will sell.
Nope, I think I've played it about 12 times. It's a great game, and the second looks like it'll be better in every possible way. This game is going to be amazing, by far one of my most anticipated.
Pfft no it's not. Do you actually think all, or ANY of those 100,000 people wont buy Starcraft 2 because of this? Eff no. If they are that obsessed with Starcraft they are obviously still going to get it. They are just being whiny little b*tches who can't adapt to change, but there is no way they are not going to buy this game if the game is that big of a deal for them to go out of their way to sign a petition over.
Why do people compare every MMO to WoW like it's the only MMO in the world? There are tons of Korean MMOs that are way more popular than WoW. WoW is a terrible game, why do people even want to be like it?
I plug my computer into my TV all the time but even with HDMI or DVI connection it doesn't look nearly as good as on a monitor. And yes, you can PLUG a controller into your computer, you can't use it wirelessly, so unless your computer is sitting right next to your couch and tv, which it's not for most people, you only have about 4 feet of USB cord to play with.
Agreed. I actually have it for PC but I'm going to buy the GOTY edition for PS3 with all the DLC when it comes out just for that reason. My girlfriend loves watching me play RPGs and she doesn't want to sit on the couch alone and watch me hunched over a keyboard 10 feet away playing on my PC. While I do like having the graphics maxed out on PC, I'd find it much more enjoyable to play it on the couch on the big tv.
So it's better because you can enter cheats and get all the weapons and ammo in the game without doing anything? Kinda defeats the purpose of playing the game and makes it less fun, don't you think?
And I'd rather play a game structured by a professional video game development company rather than add crappy mods made by some gross basement virgin video game designer wannabe.
I'm guessing Killzone 2 numbers. Yes, everyone is anticipating it, but come on, the others didn't sell THAT many. The only way is if there is an official price drop of $100 before the game comes out and the only reason people are buying new systems is for God of War 3.
Another boring war shooter with stupid 12 year old homophobic racist retards screaming in multiplayer, haven't people gotten bored of these yet? I have absolutely no interest in this game whatsoever, or any other Activision game as of now.
Lately I've been playing more PS2 games than PS3 games. These people need to remember that not everyone is a games journalist and gets every $60-$70 game for free. PS2 games are like $15, and there are currently way more (good) PS2 games out there than PS3, so yes, it is.
I think this game would be more appealing if they had armor and melee weapons as well, instead of guns, and if the game was in third person/had the option to play in third person, so you could actually SEE your loot on the person. If it's just guns and you can't see the impact of your loot on the characters it kind of defeats the purpose of a loot whoring game. Besides, ANOTHER FPS, sigh... Third person > first person any day of the week.
Since when is 8 a bad score? I bet you're one of those kids who think anything under 9 sucks and refuse to buy it, causing companies who actually make good games to lose money, just because they're not Modern Warfare 2 or Madden or other multi-million dollar sellers. Moron. The writing and dialog are not cheesy if you've watched the animated series, which this game is based off of. It's essentially a "children's cartoon", albeit a more mature one. You're probably one of those loser...
Blah this game looks too futuristic for me. Hasn't been a good Final Fantasy game since 9, and it doesn't look like this will be any different.
This article assumes that everyone has both consoles, which I assure you is not the case.
"Finally"? It's been like, a week.
Sweet, can this laptop play God of War 3, Heavy Rain, Uncharted 2, Demon's Souls, White Knight Chronicles, FFXIII, Infamous, LittleBigPlanet, Metal Gear Solid 4, Killzone 2, Agent and The Last Guardian too?!...oh no wait, it's just a laptop.