I don't like Uncharted as a game, I think if it had bad graphics then no one here would like it, there's just not much to it. I really enjoyed R1. R2 for some reason didn't grab me. R3 I have hopes for though.
The thing is sony does gt games and everthing else, where MS just does halo really.
But most people who come to N4G want to here about there world enhancing not vanishing, there's a fear that we will lose what we love. If this stuff takes over.
Because it does sell and it's most likely cheaper to produce. It's fear that's getting everyone reacting.
This is aMAZEing. NO but seriously I love maze games.
True plus they also perform better. I witnessed this playing BoarderLandds on my mates Slim, he had no pop in when level loading and he was into his levels faster than I was.
We were playing LAN when PSN was down so being right next to each other I got to see the difference first hand, and the difference is very obvious in the Slims favor.
I wana Slim now.
Ok would everyone agree that Drake is a fictional character?
Ok if you agree then we can move on to the fact. IF they were to use this tech then Drake would have to look the same as the actor being scanned.
Now Drake wouldn't look like Drake if they used this, and anyway it would make Uncharted feel weird and disjointed.
So they CAN"T adopt it and they would be STUPID to try.
definately, but not real time on PS3 or 360. There's not enough processing power to do it as well as show all the enviroments, cars etc.
In this game they will be loaded up as videos, and there will be no interaction or hang time like in HR or ME
I'm pretty sure LA Noires facial stuff ain't real time, so I don't think it would work for Mass Effect or Heavy Rain.
I thought this game was free roam? It must not be.
Well it's nice to have the option, but I'm about 5 percent online 95 percent offline. Reliving the same scenario over and over in multiplayer is boring for me personally.
But I do like coop story modes like borderlands, something engaging, somethng dynamic.
What makes everyone in here think they know better than Nintendo?... Nintendo have blasted the compition with their simple console and will do it again.
Nintendo does not have to prove anything to anyone on N4G or any other hardcore types because we/us do nothing but bitch about what we have right now, and what we have is awesome. Yet we are never happy.
So why not target those who mindlessly jump into a sale?
Sony produces the best games, why the fuck would we leave?
Seeing how I'm not a COD addict like the rest of you, I still got plenty to do on my PS3.
There are some smart cookies in here. Finally instead of going on about how this and that is better, you guys are finally realising that if you have both... YOU'RE THE FARKING MANTIS! But yeah it's good to have both hooked up to the same TV ya dig.
Yeah exactly right, however I can't stand Mario and I played all those Nin names to death when I had a NES and SNES.
PS3/Xbox still has more to do (in gaming). But Nin may prove me wrong, but I doubt it because they ain't out to prove anything. Flatline............
I dont see the point in this new console just like I didn't see the point in the first wii. It would be silly for me to buy this, because it really ain't no different from the PS3 or Xbox, and I have more than enough to do on these consoles.
wii 2 isn't doing the gaming world any new favors and going on about how Nintendo are making this and that much money is like working for a big company that is hitting 4mil a month target, but the company is only paying you mi...
Lol they sent him pizzas?! They did him a favour lol.
Back on topic. This is why I don't buy release products, they always have problems and are at their most expensive.
Man I love the sound of your old style audio, I built me a 18"inch sub thats was 102dB @1watt 1m, at around 24Hz.
Haha my sub at 1watt is louder than most at 100. But I love older speakers they have a nice thickness.
Can't say I like Cliff, looks like the type of guy that would get to you after a while lol.