Oh No bro, you triggered a Princess :'D
And a bunch of SJW weirdos xD
The X-men is prolly gonna be a DLC pack or something because they know that those chars are some of the most popular from the old games :O
TLDR bro :P
God damn it, it was an integral part of being Kratos -_-
They better put in the f*****g obligatory mini game which provided a lot of orbs xD
Don't go PC on me Sony!
Only need one: Because it's really good
I'm pretty sure Inquisition won a couple of GOTY awards bruh. Anyway, it wasn't as good as Origins but I thought it was good :D
It really wasn't. It was an okay game, with major issues in animation, VA and dialogue script.
The gameplay was fun, a couple of the side quests were fun, but the common consensus, and with good reasons, is that the game was a disappointment.
But hey, a minority of people liked it and that's fine. I enjoy some games more than other people as well.
It IS artificial demand creation. No one is saying the demand isn't there, but its a common marketing tool, to heighten interest by putting out limited quantity of products or creating "exclusivity" in one way or the other. It's the same as Nespresso does, creating an "exclusivity segment" for product owners, thereby enhancing interest of non-owners, in terms of inclusion.
It's one of those games that never gets really good or really bad, it's just there :)
A lot of the ridiculous bugs have been patched, the dialogue is more or less written by a 12-year-old and the exploratory part is the best thing in the game when you're grounded.
There's no real sense of dread from the antagonist and it's baiting a sequel like there's no tomorrow.
Don't expect too much and buy it when disco...
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say no. No they won't. Nintendo doesn't learn, Nintendo just does! :P
No, they're not. Paid mods are essentially just dlc content the devs were too lazy to create. If anything, I'd rather donate directly to the modders themselves, if the mods are awesome.
..... f*****g Bethesda -_-
But if we're talking statistical write up, there wouldn't be any difference in Xbox live users. There would be a statistical differential in terms of server population, p2p hosting and dedicated servers for each game, but that wouldn't be affecting either MS or Sony.
Theoretically, the only difference in case of cross-play, would be active online participants, not subscribed users (live/plus).
It's only exclusives that should be confined t...
You sir, are getting really f*****g annoying. Can't you at least just put in a link to the list or something, it's annoying to scroll through.
Just because they have more sales, doesn't mean they have the right attitude going forward. They have the games, that's the groundwork for the sales.
Another thing entirely is this weird ass stance on cross-platform play, which is a detriment to online console gamers on all platforms.
Actually really annoying that Sony just continually says no to cross-platform. The more people online the better :D
I can understand FPS games not being optimal between PC and consoles but other than that, Sony should nut up and accept the proposals already :)
Dude, I would honestly like to run through the game again, but what people are complaining about is the fashion of release, which is just blatantly trying to get the green before WW2... They don't even try to hide their intentions anymore, they know a lot people will jump and bark for them
But Activision treat all gamers like s***t and have lost all contact with realistic price points.
Even so, my Xbox is collecting dust right now, because of a lack of exclusives. I buy multiplats on ps4, besides their steady flow of exclusives.
Xbox is just kinda... sitting there, playing the Akon lonely song, only really getting the occasional games with gold games -_-
This is prolly the wrong thing to be thinking about, but isn't it Blizzard's ONLY FPS! ... Kinda wins by default xD