yea but i think its exclusive to quest, which is weird. hopes it come to pc vr aswell.
in VR its a whole new game.
proof? they pointed out issues on PC version as well that was running on windows that is owned by MS, hmmm.
i dont play on mobile but from what i played a little its very easy to switch characters, you just touch character avatar.
Also while these revenue numbers shows mobile, they still include a huge amount of pc players as me and many of my friends usually top up from mobile and play on PC. So saying that the numbers are just mobile is a incorrect.
there is no building aspect in yet(planned for future though), but story is decent, combat is very well done and main selling point imo. characters and art style is very good as well.
Its a full AAA title, and a very polished one.
leak wouldn't even matter to most people if only we had clearer info on future content and a roadmap.
lol same can be said for console. they should stop releasing games for base console and only focus Pro versions since they offer the best versions anyway /s
its better to wait for sale, really not worth such a high price.
@Class_Viceroy - the only idiot here is you, that game has 88% very positive rating on steam. with major websites giving like Gamespot, IGN giving 9 and 8 rating respectively. yes its a great game, and majority of people enjoyed it.
its a good game if you just want to enjoy playing single player with great combat and exploration like 1-2 hours a day.
otherwise its a grind fest and not worth playing competitively if you care about your well being.
"AMD's Equivalent to DLSS", it took Nvidia quite some time to polish it. their DLSS 1.0 implementation was awful. I'll be surprised if AMD could reach anywhere close to 2.0 specially given their track record with drivers.
nonetheless its great news for both console owners and amd card owners.
nothing you said make sense tho, this game was announced 2 years after the release, even if Sony announced it on release date(for ps4) that this will be coming to PC in 2 years people who liked the game would go for PS anyway regardless.
and the whole reason to get a console is not only because of exclusive there are many many more reason to want a console(personally I would never get one as i dont need) e.g price/value, lounge gaming, plugNplay etc.
noelle shield does not get benefit from her c6 actually. c3 gives her the most shield benefits, other const are just for damage purely.
hardly, she will still have more HP event at <50% thn most other dps characters, not to mention she has self sustain in her Q(Ult) during her E buff.
having a shield characters like the above poster mention is the way to go, even xingqui might be enough with his resistance and damage mitigation on swords.
well ps4 has the same cpu, yet it didnt have any "Kinect" stealing the budget.
well 130k viewers does, and you as well since you took the time to comment.
well it might actually be on PC on same day as switch due to emulation
it has overwhelmingly positive reviews on steam with 60k reviews. has nothing to do with twich and youtube.
sales != good rating.
cyber punk is only mostly positive with way more sales.
that's not the only reason.
its only very noticeable in games where you have to use joystick for movement and does not have teleport option, it does take some time to get use to.
However i havnt gotten use to that in 6+ month now. so i just dont play games with locomotion other thn teleport.