Weak month.
Sounds like $5 is a lot of money to you.
Day 1 for me no matter the price. But the higher the price the better because I want a quality experience. I'm already worried about the graphical hit. Not only will games need to be downgraded to play but the screen door effect will also hurt image quality.
360 games play worse on xb1. PS2 games are improved on PS4.
Bad review. Fun game.
PS Now is a bargain. $100 a year and my son can stream a collection of nearly 300 games anywhere and I can stream games from my office. Great deal.
Because it's old.
Gamers are the cheapest, whiniest group of people around. And this is the most fabricated gaming controversy I have ever seen.
I enjoyed the game my first play through but the game is terrible after your first 5.5 hour play through. You've already seen the story and you realize on the second play through that your choices don't matter. Choosing who to saw in half did not matter. Choosing to save the couple from the falling icicle did not matter. And on the second play through the glaring plot holes are far more noticeable. It's a solid game and a good rental, but isn't worth close to $60.
So they are giving killer instinct season 1 when season 3 is about to release. Lame. Never heard of Zheros but it looks really bad. Weak month.
I have never been a fan of Guerilla but this and Rigs look cool.
I must have missed when Microsoft and Nintendo gave away games for free. I am completely not understanding why people think these games should be free. Master Chief Collection wasn't free. Grand Theft Auto 5 remaster wasn't free. If people are going to bitch & complain about Sony at least do it for something legit like their return policy or exclusives.
So you are complaining that PS Now requires the internet? Do you have a better suggestion for game streaming? What you are saying is just ridiculous. People didn't like an always online XBOX 1. Calling online streaming DRM is fanboyism.
@ Scarecrow
Games should cost what they're worth. The $60 for all games model is ridiculous. It's unfair that Until dawn costs the same as The Witcher.
I am no blind fanboy. If Sony was doing something wrong I would say it. But they arent. These games shouldn't be free. Halo MCC wasnt free to people that owned the old halo games. And why the hell should Now allow you to stream games you own for free? Netflix doesn't do that. And Now isn't a form of BC. Now is a collection of instant games u can play from anywhere.
I took my son to the arcade last night & spent $150. Stuff costs money. No idea how people can complain about $15 for something that will give them over 50 hours of entertainment .
Rent them? What are you talking about?
I have purchased movies, like Titanic and Jurassic Park, on VHS, DVD, Bluray, and Bluray 3D. Never once did I think I should get the upgrade for free. And how many times have I purchased Mario 1 and 3 with NO improvements and never got a free copy from Nintendo. Not even across wiiu/3ds.
PS Now is a cool service. So hypocritical and sad XB fanboys are calling it a a DRM service. Funny they don't rip Netflix apart for charging them to watch Three Men and a Baby because they own an old VHS copy.
I never expected Sony to give away copies of improved PS2 games. It's such an odd, new problem. NOBODY complained when all the Sony Collections released last gen and weren't free. Gamers are so damn whiny. And it's funny too because Sony has been the com...
Only a destiny article could someone say that he spent 1400 fun hours on the game and someone says he's part of the problem because he bought a game w no content.
Gamers have become so stupid. Just whiny fanboys that care more about what others are playing. So much irrational hate towards games like Destiny & CoD. Many games have less then 10 hours of content but destiny had a full length campaign/co-op/MP with good replay value but people endlessly complain about a l...
WTF is a main game and why do people fill the need to pretentiously say it is best played in short burts?