Game on then Sony, game on.
No console preference myself, but Kinect irritates me more than anything because the media keeps calling it the 'next generation of gaming'. What do you think?
Doesn't look like it's working well in this video buddy.
At this point, I don't think MS really cares because they know people will buy it regardless. Damn you commercial advertising!
Looking to end the year with a blast. GT5 and LBP2, holy snikes!
Run GIRL!
Thanks to Action Bastard for the laughs!
Run damnit, RUN! WTF!
LOL! Bubs+ for that!
Actually, when it was first released, the 120GB was $199.
I run a Sager (Clevo) and it runs StarCraft II fine.
More profits equal more games. Awesome.
Which is why you have to give credit to Sony for giving us awesome exclusives. MS on the other hand is slacking.
And that is why the journalist will bash GT5, it's not what 'they' think it should be. Sheesh, what happened to standing on your own merit?
Little big planet has got content. A wide variety of content. And I'm not just talking about costumes either. You don't have to buy a single DLC to enjoy it either.
I'm with YoY, with Sony really starting to heat up in the gaming department with awesome exclusive after awesome exclusive, it isn't hard to figure out why Sony has done it the way they did. In the end, gamers play games, not sales.
Without the games to back it up, Kinect is a very hard sell.
Using a camera to track the motion of your controller just don't make sense. They need to come up with a better implementation than that. Don't think I ever keep my controller under control during intense gamin sessions. Not that kind of control anyway.
Hotty-hot-hot!
Awesome. Still got to get the groove back with some KZ2 action. Too much BFBC2 right now.
What goes around comes around.