He said in a past video that if it wasn't for metacritic that they would do reviews without scores.
I think if they were to do a campaign, do something similar to Halo 4's episode thing they did (can't remember what it was called). But basically have like 10 minute cgi videos to watch and then do the campaign multiplayer missions.
Dang I know there is an experience boost but seriously?! Lol. I don't want to level that fast in Titanfall or any other game, would get bored way too quickly with it.
I had one instance where the framerate went to crap when about 5 titans all went nuclear at about the same time. Other than that I haven't noticed any big drops that cause me to notice.
Maybe they are refurbished?
If they were to make a playlist with more players, and that is big if, I think they would need to make bigger maps. Half of them if not more would feel very claustrophobic with more than the current player count.
Agreed. That was the first thing I thought of while playing the beta was how they would map the controls to work on a controller. Should be awesome regardless though.
I can't say I have seen the comparisons because I haven't really had the desire to and my vision is also kind of bad, but definitely agree that this game is incredibly fun and fast paced.
Dead Rising 3 is fun especially if you have a co-op partner to play with
As soon as you said fact first, it instantly removed any actual fact from your comment.
If I stop to think about the PS3 games I have played that are better than X360 and/or PC then I can maybe think of 5 that I would say or as good or better. Again, to clarify, this is my own personal taste.
As far as I know no game I have played has that kind of scope of Skyrim. Fallout 3, NV, Witcher 2, games of those types which all worked fine on my 360 and skyrim worked better on my pc. Those are games I can name that worked from the day they came out with little or no problems for me.
Yes because nobody in this world deserves there own opinion or a choice to buy an ipad over a vita.
ODST - 2009
Halo Wars if you want to count that seeing as how it is and RTS and not an FPS was also developed by a different studio then 2008.
Since they don't involve the chief then I don't count them whereas COD has been releasing a game a year since 2004.
You can be entitled to an opinion of an unreleased game same as he can have his own opinion.
I for one don't think that any Halo game was forgettable. Even though ODST should have been dlc, it was still an interesting campaign.
Plus the fact that we will get to see what happens to the chief following the ending of Halo 3.
Oh, and tell me which game you have played recently that was a sequel that changed the core of it's gameplay and ...
Yes because I spend all my gaming time looking at the dashboard and paying attention to an ad that takes up maybe 5% of my screen space.
And when a console red-ringed, you were given a free repair or a new console for free. Plus the warranty was extended to 3 years.
You know for a fact that your friend's account got hacked and he didn't give out info? You did the investigation yourself and you know what to look for?
Gee, maybe Microsoft should hire you to do there investigations.
Millions versus thousands is a totally different number. And these hacks are mostly because stupid people use the same email and password for everything. And also it says that the person's account got hacked, not Xbox Live or Microsoft.
Halo 3 didn't impress because it was too much like Halo 2. Reach was the true next gen Halo that Halo 3 should of been. Still with that being said, Halo multiplayer has grown very old because of the fact Halo 2 was the only Xbox Live game to play at the time and little kids have taken it over. Only reason to have and/or play Halo anymore is for the campaign.
Halo 4 had a great story, one of the most interesting. However overall maybe not the best Halo when comparing multiplayer