What are you talking about?
I agree with the "they were lacking" part, I disagree with the "they are still lacking" part. The current state of NMS and SoT is, definitely, content-rich.
Is the management at EA that coco in the head? Are they blind to the financial success of Battlefield 1 compared to Battlefield V? Are they actually stupid or are they playing some 4d-chess based long-term strategy that we can't begin to comprehend? So many questions to be asked and no soothing answers.
This needs to be the cover art, extremely unique.
@sander9702
What you've just written is a clear threat. Your words can't be interpreted otherwise.
Yah, this just doesn't seem to be news-worthy (to me).
I hope they aren't working on the animations.
What if they are taking their time with the development of their next entry? The 2018 listings of Amazon Italy suggest a new one.
This piece seems to be the same as what it accuses the game of.
It does seem so similar to Crackdown 3's 2015 demo.
If the released version of Crackdown 3 represents this technology, it may be limited. Otherwise, it would seem that the contract between Microsoft and Cloudgine was broken.
It should be able to compete with next generation consoles, not only be more powerful than the X.
Megacity is the only thing I hope somebody turns into a game.
Just to correct your information, Private Division is a new subsidiary of take-two, it is not related to 2k
yes, InXile's Wasteland 3, but they did mention that the purshase will help in further developing the game (the game will still come to the promised consoles).
Bring evidence to the table or stop claiming stuff.
Chris Avellone leaving doesn't mean every good writer is too.
It may actually come to the PS4. It may be similar to the case of Wasteland 3.
The game seems to follow the same futuristic 50s theme present in Fallout. By the name of the game, it could be something similar to the universe of Treasure Planet.
Many games use previous code but with usual updates, they don't copy and paste code. It is the case here (evident by the comments provided beside the code which is provided by the article).
Well, it is your opinion (not a fact).
I don't see how is that cost effective?