In Alan What?
OMG ITS SO GROSS! ICKY!
I'd rather just have a working game at this point.
I'm starting to get the impression that no one really cares anymore. :(
Too bad Charter just went chapter eleven. :(
Your going to use XP 64-bit to increase software compatibility?
Yeah I wouldn't recommend XP 64 under any circumstances, its practically a hack job.
So I guess we're fine then because I was never attempting to cool anything, rather trying to add some logic and validity to the equation.
And you'll find that the beauty of my preposition is that it cannot possibly be false. Though I'm not even going to address the irrelevant and childish argument of "Well such and such did it FIRST!".
Is there any particular reason why they can't just go to OS XI after they run out of cats?
I think that it needs to be made clear to everyone that Apple and MS have been stealing features from each other since before any of us were allowed on the internet. And pointing the finger at just one of the two companies (Whether that be Apple or MS) at any given time is a bit calling the kettle black.
So he counters what he claims is a huge exaggeration with an even grander exaggeration.
I love it when we all use logic.
MS really doesn't make a whole lot of their money from basic OS sales.
But that being said, this will never happen nor should anyone really expect it too. We don't demand this sort of thing from other companies after they've released products of arguably poor quality, why is it OK for us to have ridiculous expectations for MS?
This man clearly doesn't know what he's talking about if he actually believes MS' plans will be at all effected my anything Linux does. MS has chosen (wisely) to play the ignore game there for years and shows no signs of giving up that policy.
A Mac can't do anything a Windows PC can't.
A Windows PC can do so many things a Mac can't.
A Mac costs more than a Windows PC.
Security and stability complaints are exaggerations and lies. XP has never crashed on me unless I, or my hardware has done something to make it crash, it won't take long for Vista to reach this point. Leopard had some rather major stability issues at launch as well. As far as security goes If you use the right browser and avoid irresponsible ...
I want a PC demo.
Chrome is brutally insecure, takes up alot of memory, and has numerous application bugs.
Yes its just a beta, but for the moment I stand unimpressed.
I'd install it simply because I'm a web developer and like to have every browser I can possibly get my hands on installed for testing purposes.
Though generally when it comes to cross-browser compatibility ignorance is bliss.
I think you've replied to the wrong comment...
We are really more like the Roman empire right before the fall of Rome. Which is nothing to brag of.
Well first I will make clear that I feel expressing your political views so dogmatically on an internet comment box is a complete waste of time regardless of what side you’re on.
That being said my own views (and you don't HAVE to agree with me) is that both of our choices are weak sauce. You have McCain who was probably one of the most liberal republicans in the senate suddenly turning into this neoconservative after he secured the nomination, excuse me if I don't trust someone ...
So how did DIVCE happen to get the nonexistent final build? Oh.