yeah that is also another issue. Our eyes aren't used to watching things in 3D and could put a lot of stress on the eye in that case. Nonetheless, some are pretty cool with 3D, like Kung Fu Panda for example. I thought it looks great in 3D compare to non 3D. It seems 3D looks good for animated movies, but usually doesn't work well with real life movie though.
U only mention the ups of PSN or PSN+. What about the negative side of it (same for xlive). It is just like an advertisment for PSN where only the goods were mentions, while the negatives are neglected.
1. do u get discount on everything (1st,2nd,3rd party), including new DLC, new games, etc.. or only selected fews with PSN+?
2. What if i don't buy stuff online much (which i don't), is PSN+ worth it?
3. Are there abundant of great contents commin...
@gamespawn
While u do make some sense, and i do agree that the free part is the best thing about PSN. However, u only mention about the free and some discount (for which u have to pay more to make it worth it anyways, think of it as a coupon books.), but u haven't mention what xlive gold offers? Would it be better to give a list of what offers on both side? It seems your argument is one sided.
It would make much more sense to give a list of what ...
didn't they already reveal that Bill Gate was under the master chief suit?
a problem would be standardizing the 3D glasses. Every company has their own propriatary glasses to go with their TV (supposedly only work on their tv). It doesn't make sense.
Child of Eden is very responsive (1:1 like responsive serioulsy), so is Dance Central and kinect sport, while some other games aren't. Not every developers can get the same performance though.
@digoutyoursoul8
how do u know core gamer haven't bought the wii? Why don't u look up the sell numbers of 1st and 3rd party games on the wii and compare that to anything else on x360 and ps3 (usually u see them on top of the chart NPD/GFtrack/VGchart worldwide a...
did ND already said this will be focusing on Sully and Drake?
about time. I don't want to pay extra for stupid DLC costumes.
@revenor
i was simply respond to Liore
"gametrailers awarded uncharted 3 the best graphics of E3 beating battlefield 3 on pc"
We are simply talking about technical aspect of BF3 on console vs pc, not artistic aspect of it. From the way Liore is saying, meaning PS3 is more technically advance than PC?
And yes resolution does make it better, but what are u willing to give up (scale, fps, amount of things on ...
yup, agree with realgamer. The kinect work better than control for this game. It just feel right. Try kinect first then try to use controller, u'll see a big difference. Good thing is, kinect respond is great (1:1 like to me if you set it on fast mode) Although 3D for this game would be amazing too, it is made for it.
UC3 would probably have:
1. better story
2. more interesting characters
3. some interesting set pieces
Gears 3:
1. better gameplay, especially game modes and MP
2. more variety in enemies/ weapons/ etc...
Take it what u will, but both are great either way to get this holliday.
And MGS4 also won best graphics for the year, it ran at 1024x768 (2xAA), where as Gears 2 ran at 1280x720p (2xAA). I think u don't understand the difference between artistic (not base on technical aspect) and graphics (which is based on technical power of the hardware).
They also give graphic of the year to Okami back then in ps2 era, so do you think graphic award have anything to do with the technical aspect of the console?
If they want to give graphic ...
Then UC3 should also be in 60fps and 1080p as well, or else fanboy should blame ND for running it at only 30fps and only 720p. Well they did blame BF3, why not UC3?
@dualconsoleowner
then perhaps you should give a list comparing ps3 1st party games to BF3. Heck how about comparing any ps3 exclusive to Resident Evil 5 for example.
1. scale (open/scripted open/straight up linear)
2. texture
3. lighting
4. tech behind these game
5. destructible/interactive environment
6. AA
7. polygon
8. amount of things on screen.
9. frame rate.
something lik...
After reading a couple of articles about BF3, i realized there are a lot of people who are living in denial. Seriously, EA shouldn't have to explain about these issue with console. Either many ps3 owner on here are like 7 years old, that doesn't know better, or people that have been brain washed by the almighty Sony.
How many time do people have to explain that ps3 isn't a PC, is that something impossible to understand?
exactly. Although i can see this one would be good for the ps3 move as well, and this is one game that work marvelously if in 3D. This game is meant to be play with motion control and in 3D.
not really, the 1st xbox was a much better product hardware wise than ps2, and more expansive too, what happen? It sold terrible in japan and not so great everywhere else, Japan didn't want quality back then perhaps?
well perhaps the expectation of ps3 power isn't what it all crack up to be. Just reality, and it can be pretty hard for some to admit and to move on when they believe so blindly in something/someone said for so long when they don't really understand anything about it.
No please just don't compare to PC, what is the point?
nice..dragon dogma look like it is pretty unique gameplay and great fighting mechanic too. Asura is just insane.
@godmars
"MS will likely always hold itself back. Look for the leading trend trying to take it, rather than make it. Halo was something they bought after-all."
so technically, u are saying that Sony bought UC, GoW, KZ, R&C too then, cause Sony didn't make it either. They bought those developers, and many more developers as well.