baodeus

Member
CRank: 5Score: 58290

I do agree with u guys that MS give up on certain games quite quickly if they aren't doing like Gears numbers. Although acquiring developers might be better, but in a business sense, it would cost a lot more to do so. Instead, i think MS are testing waters by buying exclusives deals (LO, SC:Conviction, Alan Wake, etc...). If anything stick, they'll support it. They took the safety route i guess. I think MS should at least give certain games (lost Odyssey, Phantom Dust, Otogi, Ala...

5381d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@zerochaos

agree.

Although i would think she would look good. I mean Shephard gotta have some good taste when he shags all women in his team, and most looking pretty good (well except maybe Jack, but she does have that aggressive side).

I know a lot of guys tend to go for that innocent but deadly in bed kinda of girl look, like Tali for example (if you have seen that scene).

5382d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@just the truth

then u haven't play child of eden or kinect sport. Again, kinect getting a lot of support for core game as an OPTION, like the move for example.

Where do people keep getting the idea that Kinect is mandatory for the upcomming core games?

MOVE,Wii, kinect are optional, especially for core games. They only add some different perspectives to gaming. Some may like it and some don't, but they are always options.
...

5382d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@one2thr

1. Why developers like ND/GG has not been able to put out higher resolution than 720p with consistent 60fps yet when they claim they have max out ps3 back in UC2/KZ2?

2. Does racing game take as much resources as these other games? Like why do u think it is quite possible for games like Rayman origin can run at 1080p at 60fps, or even at 1080p at 120fps for some arcade games?

4. Can anyone honestly list the kind of graphical problem...

5382d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

shocking, x360 actually have a lot of good RPG this gen including JRPG (Lost odyssey/TOV -> so underrated).

5382d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@brianG

Do u want me to lists them or u can do it yourself if you have played the game. I mean, c'mon do we have something to hide or what? U can practically go a look up on n4g for other articles and see what those are if you didn't know or rather gloss over. It isn't really a big deal (if the game is good, it is fine to me), but this is about tech discussion and if we need new console or not, because that is what happening right now. Developers are stuck at ...

5383d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@brianG

then what did they do to achieve that, as in what did they sacrifice to achieve that resolution?

5383d ago 0 agree3 disagreeView comment

true, but i think u given sony fanboy too much credit. They may be the dominant factor on n4g, but out side, they are well small fries. If they are responsible for a large chunk of game sell, u wouldn't see CoD on ps3 killing every ps3 exclusives right now.

5383d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment

what untapped power? Have u seen any improvement in resolution beyond 720p while trying to maintain 60fps or AA? ND, GG, all claim to have use 100% of ps3 (although they did say there are still room for optimization), and they haven't been able to ran UC/KZ beyond 30fps and at only 720p. It got even worst when they tried to add split screen/3D. It is not like Ps3 has no limit man.

5384d ago 7 agree13 disagreeView comment

@shinigo

exactly, quality and quantiy isn't the same thing, but when the game got both rating and sell, there got to be something about it right?

CoD is not a bad game (i hate fps so it doesn't mean anything to me, but it doesn't mean other will think like me), but based on data wise (fact), it is no where near as bad as people on n4g made it out to be. It is also fact that CoD is more popular, especially online MP with high rating (again only 0...

5385d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So if they heard everyone plays it and how cool it is, but how does that not make it a good game if everyone like it (excluding marketing for now, which i do think play a lot in how much game sell)?

I think there are a lot of misconception between quality and quantity. How about this, quality = rating and quantity = sell.

CoD: rating 94, sell ~16-18 millions
UC: rating 96, sell ~4 million

So CoD rating is really good (0.2 behind UC2)...

5386d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

here is an example:

let see how many FPS game are out there to play:

Halo remake
BFBC 3
CoD
Resistance
KZ3
Rage
sniper
Crysis 2
more....but i can't think right now

1. so are everyone gonna buy every of these games?
2. will some of these games get cut if it isn't up to par with other games?
3. Does exclusives really matter in this case?

5386d ago 7 agree0 disagreeView comment

@nathanexplosion

so how does it get popular and sell in the first place?

@solar
"UC is a gamers' game. CoD is a casual game"
dam, u just technically erase the line between core and casual games. So what would u consider a hard core game
1. game that sell the most = casual and game sell less = hardcore)?
2. hardcore games = Ps3 exclusives?

5386d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

@cooperdnizzle
" To many games within in sony competing against one another... And think about it."

so how do u explain this:
1. KZ2 selling more than KZ3 with less number of consoles?
2. How Socom, Mag, etc...are doing?
3. Why CoD is still the highest selling game on ps3 instead of the ps3 exclusives?

So think about this:
1. How are Sony marketing for these exclusives?
2. Do these new IPs do anything ...

5386d ago 15 agree20 disagreeView comment

I think graphics on both console look fine as they are, but what they need though is smoother framerate/gameplay, which a new consoles would help. Current console can't push higher resolution without putting stress on framerate, AA -> which mean limitation is already reached. Optimization can make them look a tad better, but i haven't seen one dam improvement in framerate, higher resolution, better AA, etc...

5387d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well u can see differences between pc and xbox, but xbox version actually isn't too bad looking really (not as clean/clear/heavier textures, or better lighting as the PC) Although, what important is the frame rate and smoother game play, and yes, we do need next gen for those. Graphic wise it looks good enough.

5387d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

@mrv321
no, it requires me to buy 3Dtv which cost a lot more than a kinect just to play game. If 3D has positive benefit for you, why can't kinect have benefit for others? And no, 3D has proven to lower game performance (they have to rendered twice instead of one, imagine Halo Reach rendered x4). U not getting consistent 30fps as it is, not to mention 3D included.

Again, unless everyone think like u, which they aren't, then u might have a valid poin...

5389d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Can u consider power stone 2 of a cinematic multiplayer?

5389d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Well i don't agree with Sin 151, and i do agree MS is pretty low on exclusives this year.

but to make thing clearer between quantity and quality, let take a look at it this way

Sale = how popular the game is (quantity)
rating (>7) = how good the game actually is (quality)

so let compare some of the top exclusives (sales, top rating of the franchise, include publishing exclusives, no online only/xlive/psn game):

5389d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@mrv321

1. eyetoy was pretty much dead, not like kinect though
2. Then why Sony is adding 3D to everything then?

5392d ago 4 agree0 disagreeView comment