It's not that important to me either, but the debate isn't about what's more important, it's about which one is better. And as far as image quality goes, more than two times IS better. 200 dollars is better than one, two times the pixels is better
I would say that pushing more than twice as many pixels on the same game IS significantly better
IMO cost should not be factored into a review. maybe mentioned, but not factored into score. Three years from now it's not gonna be thirty bucks, but the review score will still be there for anyone to look up and read
Don't be afraid. No one is ever going to buy xblades the prologue, or drake of the 99 dragons prologue. Not every game can get away with this
600p on ps3/360
Disgusting? Lol. You can't be serious
Not just 1080p, but dynamic weather system absent on xbone
You don't need to be online to play ps+ games. They work perfectly fine offline. As long as your still subbed.
Maybe he likes playing it. Why is that not ok? Fuck him for not hating what you hate and liking what you like, right? I enjoy killzone, too. It must all be some conspiracy
The gap between 720p and 1080p is bigger than 640 to 720.
But you need a psn acct to view it, no? I think you have to be 18 to sign up for psn
It's not, though. All 3 games will be on 360
Movies look smooth to a degree at 24 frames because they double and triple flash frames. If you don't think the human eye can see above 27, go see hobbit 2 or tge next one at 48 and tell me you don't see a diff
16:9 TVs have been bullshit from the start as far as movies are concerned. Movies have been shot in 235 for way longer than 16x9 TVs have been on the market. Blame tv manufacturers
How could the reviewer make a compelling arguement about how the rest of the game would be if he/she has no idea, because they never finished it? I've played plenty if games that start slow, but get better as it progresses. Personally, I wouldvt trust a review of anyone who hasn't at least finished the main campaign
Anyone who has sank any amt of time whatsoever into 13 knows that it's not "press x to win". I put 165 hrs into 13 and it was primarily the battle system that kept me coming back.
Even with auto battle, the game takes quite a bit of strategy to play, but you can change the battle speed to slow and pick individual moves if that's more your thing.
I'm gonna buy a wii u on launch day of this game. I don't care if I ever play another game on it again, this ones worth it. Thankfully I have a six year old who can take it over when I'm done with it
@george
How you can rely on Internet video for comparison is beyond me. The diff in say, AC from 900p to 1080 is very noticeable. Don't get me wrong, it doesn't affect the game whatsoever, but it is indeed noticeable
^^^ this.
If anyone thought machinima was unbiased and not taking money, you might as well keep watching those reviews
Yeah I've already put more hours into GZ than it took me to finish the good play through of infamous. I'd say I got my money's worth.