Driveclub isn't a dissapointment, a lot of sites are giving it very high ratings, and it came out last year.
This is a serious question. What in that show convinced? I saw nothing appealing or surprising.
Not to mention, ran through youtube's compression, which severely damages quality.
There's a good chance it's a combination of 4 or more of these theories.
Many games that are released using nvidia works have performance and bug issues upon release with amd and nvidia cards. They have it in contracts that the code of nvidia works can not be modified. It's a broken system that leads to game breaking glitches. This isn't an isolated incident. nVidia continually makes business decisions that I can't support, which is why I refuse to support nVidia. Now, if you want to make a reactionary response, go ahead, but I wasn't solely refere...
Well, glad I'm getting this on ps4. Because if a pc game says Nvidia on it, it's going to be broken at launch.
The ps4 is old enough at this point that AAA games shoild probably start appearing.
Yeah I know, but I wanted the combat showcased a little bit more. Unless it's different from 4, it's gonna be a pass for more unless this gets rave reviews.
These to suck. Can they actually play the game? Or are they just going to climb buildings the whole time?
This game isn't going to be fallout 4, and I don't know why they would try to go up against it. Tomb raider doesn't really have a good time to release though. It's a good game, but every title seems to take priority over it in the eyes of most gamers.
I could see this thing costing as much as a nice gaming PC, and it's just not worth what it gives you in my opinion. It's a really good piece of tech, don't get me wrong, but I don't see it as being very good for games. Aside from cool gimmicks, what does this bring to the table when it comes to gaming? It would be really cool having the world of minecraft rise above you, but how much is that actually good for, practically speaking? It will be cool for education, research, and...
I'm interested in this game, but I'm definitely waiting to see what reviewers have to say.
Looks really good, but still pretty evident it's a last gen game. I'm curious to see how big of a makeover uncharted 1 gets though.
There were only a couple parts in the game where you HAD to use a gun really. The defense part with Ellie and David, the part in the high school, and the basement of the hotel are all that comes to mind.
They made a game that is unlike any other. It's mechanically a lot more sluggish than any other game they've made though, and that's a good thing. While Joel is kind of a bad ass because he's live in this world for so long, he's still supposed to feel like a person that feels pain. This is one of the first games where firing a gun as close to as realistic as firing one in real life, and not like I'm some super hero shooting bullets out of a laser pointer. This is where...
Oh my God, I know! Amazon is going to get some blowback for this.
Everybody's gone to the rapture is long?
Being the maker of the fox engine alone, Kojima is the best asset the Konami had, the fact that he made one of the most beloved franchises ever is just makes this doubly true. And while I'm incredibly sad Konami is being so disrespectful, I thought this was news months ago. Wasn't he already taken of the cover?
Also, I hope people here will stick to their guns when they say they're done with Konami after this.
Did they even change anything?
I love how limbo is on this list. Limbo is the worst platformer I've ever played, and I don't understand all the praise that it gets for the life of me. The dev's definition of a puzzle I guess is bashing your head into a wall replaying the same 2 minute checkpoint for thirty minutes because another random thing you couldn't see kills you, then you have to do it all again with timing and accuracy so ridiculously perfect that solving the "puzzle" is only 1% of the tot...