Tom Clancy is a franchise nowadays, not a dude. Although it's a pity that he died last year, that won't prevent the release of new Tom Clancy games. Ubi bought the rights to use the name back in 2008.
http://www.videogamer.com/p...
@Nes_Daze Or maybe it shows Titanfall is fun to these people ?
"hours and hours" ? really ? You didn't have to play much in MP to get the best ending... if you had enough war assets, just playing 2 hours in MP was enough to get it. They changed it with the EC anyway, you didn't need MP at all after it came out.
XB1 is significantly blurrier indeed... but what strikes me the most in this screenshot is how terrible it looks even on PS4, I'm glad I saw gameplay footage, cause based on this screen alone, I'd say the game looks terrible.
Sure, you said consoles, cause there are more than ones. You also said "Not going to say which are the weaker ones because I'm sure you guys already know.".
Anyway, I've seen your video last year. You misunderstand my point. Back then I thought the same thing as I do now. "Neat, though not as good looking as in the reveal trailer". I just don't think that new trailer looks as bad as some of you seem to imply.
Also, instead of ...
"Why has this game seen a downgrade?"
Probably because the hardware it ran on when it was revealed is unfortunetly far too expensive for consoles to rival it.
What is very obvious is that you're paranoid and/or delusional if you actually think that anyone at ubi thought it would be a good plan to significantly downgrade a game on one system just so that the other system doesn't look as bad, especially if their objective was to prevent people from comparing them when the games come out (not to mention they never did that).
They knew people would compare with what they've already seen, and they also know people always co...
Complaining about a game doesn't make it a complete flop either.
Don't kid yourself, they'd felt limited on ps3 too.
Games on 360 are region locked. That's different. Some are region free and work on all 360s.
@allgamespc2012 just cause you didn't care doesn't mean nobody did. Not everything in DA2 was bad.
I'd say the big problem of the game were the reused environment, then people disliked the obvious "waves" of enemies during combat, and the fact that the story was centered around three evebts in the life of a character instead of some epic war like Origins was.
The party members were for the most part well written and cannot be considered...
@-Foxtrot But you're assuming there's something indisputably wrong about the game. And what if I like the game the way it is, and don't think there's anything wrong with it? should I still delay my purchase cause some people/reviewers don't like it or some of the decisions the developer took? so that it benefits "all of us" and teaches the developper a lesson?
I'm not just talking about lightning returns but about any game.
Maybe because they think they'll really like the game and don't want to wait to play it?
See, when there's a game I like, want, and when I think I'll enjoy it, I get it asap. Because I get it for my personal enjoyment, and I couldn't care less about teaching the developper a lesson by forcing myself to wait 3 months just to give them 20 bucks less.
And why is that ? it may not the best MMO, but it's still a great RPG. Far better than many of the games on that list imo. Did you play it?
Anyway, this is just his personal top 50 RPGS of all time list, not "THE" top 50 rpgs of all time list. He gets to rank the game the way he likes. I know mine would be less console centric (way too many jrpgs on that list for my taste)
What makes you think so ? There's no xbox exclusive on that list...
Really ? the combat system seemed pretty efficient to me, granted, it was not as good as in Batman, but still, it worked fairly well for a first installment and didn't stop me from enjoying the game. To each his own.
"Remember me" was not that bad, it's a 7, kinda like beyond. I don't think "incredibly poor execution" applies to that kind of games. It's not like it was star trek..
It's because it's a PlayStation exclusive, and we're on n4g. It's like people complaining because the new tomb raider is kinda like uncharted, while originally, it's the other way around... (they didn't call it "dude raider" internally by chance...)
What would I do... I'd play the game ?
After all, I didn't stop playing Awakening when my warden who died saving the world showed up in the DLC. It's not like every decision will carry over and change everything 3 games later...
As for the kid, I think it could be the other way around : even if you didn't do for the ritual in Origins, Morrigan found another way or something...
They can't keep every decisions anyway... Li...
Just cause it was beautiful when it came out doesn't mean it will be the most beautiful game till the end of times. Also, "one of the"...