See: Metacritic.com
And a review that actually compares Zelda to other games than Zelda. I despise when Nintendo first party titles are only compared to other Nintendo first party titles, making it much easier for them to get higher scores.
You shouldn't be able to get destroyed like that and take no damage unless you're playing on super-easy...
No worries. I couldn't care less about how the game plays before launch. As long as it plays well (I don't mind the occasional bug) once it has been officially released, I'm happy.
I'm getting it for PC anyway...
Portal 2 wasn't much longer yet everyone seemed to love it (myself included).
Not the same thing.
There's a reason Forza 4 is 91 on Metacritic and Gran Turismo 5 is 84. Forza 4 is a superior game. No debate.
Oblivion was better than Morrowind. There's a reason it got a higher Metacritic score.
Just look at how well designed the website is. It looks like it was designed by the same 12-year old who coded PSN's original security measures. Remarkable.
Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil, Sonic, Grand Theft Auto, and Mortal Kombat are not - and were never intended to be - trilogies.
Pathetic website puts out a pathetic article. What a surprise.
It looked like it was written by a 12 year old fanboy and not a professional gaming journalist. Pathetic.
That's basically universally accepted and acknowledged by every intelligent gamer and every critic out there. It's unarguable.
Any system that can't even handle cross-game chat clearly doesn't have very good online functionality.
Get over your fanboy biases please.
It will be either Portal 2, The Witcher 2, Skyrim, Dark Souls, RAGE, Battlefield 3, or one of the many other more innovative and fresh games coming out in 2011.
Because it wasn't in the slightest.
Microsoft is doing this so they can guarantee publishers won't give Sony exclusive deals, which is actually incredibly smart on their part and not bad for the industry at all. No one likes console specific DLC or items because then people playing on other platforms get the shaft. This guy's an idiot.
Fallout 3 and Fallout: New Vegas both followed the same path and screwed over PC/PS3 fans. At the end of the day though, who cares about an extra month of waiting for a (basically) bug free version of the DLC compared to the original buggy launches seen for most DLC.
Sony wouldn't tease us for that long, and then troll us by saying it's not ever coming only to reveal that it is coming a month later..... I don't care though because I'm not a big fan of multiplayer games anyway, and the few that I do play, I play on my 360 or on my PC.
I can't wait to find out.
Know what you're talking about before you begin to type anything you worthless nerd.