You're too harsh lol
+ bubble
the difference is massive but it doesn't look like a ps2 game without it or do you think it looks as bad as this
http://ps2.ign.com/dor/obje...
no it doesn't infact even without the high res textures it looks better than most console games including the call of duties, homefront, halo 3..etc
So much for the ps3 fanboys claiming the ps3 version would be superior to the 360 version looks like a 360 win overall but both consoles are pretty close but the 360 has significantly better textures than the ps3 version.
pc is the way BF3 is meant to be played
@Janitor
what does that have to do with anything ? whats important is that my comment is pretty easy to understand or are we in English class ? NO
the 360 version has significantly higher res textures due to having more available ram as well as full resolution alpha effects(due to edram bandwidth available to ROPS enabling them run at full capacity which isn't possible on ps3 because the rsx has too little bandwidth)
but the ps3 has slightly better lighting and better particle effects due to the fact that the console has slightly more raw power than 360.
fxaa is used on 360 while MLAA is used on ps3...
i love you
its not 1 one year leap its just a minimal overall peformance difference with each console having its strengths and weaknesses when put against each other 2005 uber spec pcs are more p[owerful than either consoles and a 2006 single gpu high end pc is over 3x more powerful than ps3.
ps3 was ready by 2005 it only launched in 2006 because of shortages in blu-ray nodes so from a tech standpoint ps3 and 360 are single gpu high end pc from 2005 with 2003 ram(yeah 512mb ram has been...
crysis 1 on pc maxed out 1080p even without mods makes this and all other console games look last generation.
so you must be talking about the console version but even the console version is one of the best looking console games and it has scale and destruction
it looks last gen compared to the pc version infact DIE stated themselves that consoles run BF3 at pc minimum settings. It does look better than any FPS I've seen on consoles though DICE has done an amazing job on consoles BF3 could possibly be the best looking console game but even if it ps3 fanboys will deny it because its not a ps3 exclusive
only 6 spes are available to game developers 1 was disabled to increase manufacturing yield and another is reserved for the OS(XMB)
and you are wrong 99% of multiplats are first developed for consoles and then ported to pc.
naughty dog already said the gp between uc2 and uc3 wouldn't be nearly as big as that of uc1 to uc2 as such a leap is only possible once in a generation
I'd really love to see what halo 4 brings the halo universe has alot of potential and I don't mind halo continuing as long as the new releases are good
I just want MS to work on more exclusive IPS to supplement halo,gears and forza they could bring back alan wake, lost odyessy, killer instinct, kameo, perfect dark and banjo kazooie and I think those IPs will be enough to sustain the xbox brand
the ps3 just like 360 is no match for a 2005 ultra spec pc so please don't expect it to match the pc version even the pc version running minimum(lowest possible) settings will look much better than the console version this was the case with crysis 2
the cell is overrated and only outpeforms a Pentium 4 on single precision vector based operations(which are what the spes are good at) which is just 1 area out of so many that determine overall cpu performance. the cell is a b...
the ps3 has less usable ram than 360 and the fact that the ram is spit and not unified makes matters worse
PS3 = 1024×720
360 = 1152×720
both use TSAA
360 version is better
console fanboys in 5..4...3....2......1..*takes cover* lol
@dante112
its only a matter of time :(
really ? sony does the same thing why'd you leave that out
http://gizmodo.com/338763/s...
http://www.cnet.com.au/sony...
http:/...
gt5 is not more realistic in the graphics department because not all tracks and car models look good, 800 of the cars look like they where ported from ps2 and a number of tracks also look like ps2 quality in comparison to others I don't know why some people on here don't talk about gt5s visual inconsistency
even at its best gt5 and forza 4 are very close visual quality wise it all depends on opinion they do seem to have different color schemes.
gt5 d...
depends on the track and cars(whether premium or standard) gt5 graphics are inconsistent some tracks look like they where ported from ps2 compared to others
depends on what you mean you know that gt5 premium car models look much better than standard right ?
xbox 360 has better shadowing and texture quality and less screen tearing but ps3 has better lighting