May have to jump on this when it comes out. Never got into Destiny but it always looked fun. Hopefully Sony won't go out of their way to write blank checks for times exclusivity.
Grubsterbeater wouldn't know about the many new IP's MS has out and are coming because fanboys like him who prefer Sony don't do their research not to mention they don't even own an Xbox to begin with,
I want to ask a serious question too? Why the concern in new IP's from MS for Xbox when your types are not interested in the console anyways?
Real talk?
No matter what you'll find something else wrong, look at meta...
Except not everyone games on PC now does it? lol
Would you say it's in carbonite stasis?
Still have my copy, MS continues to impress.
Chicago! It's already GTA out there.It wouldn't take much to make a game out of that place.
Does it have games you can't play on PS4? Yup.
It should have been multi player only ;)
In all seriousness, there is not much hype because now the game is multiplat.
So now there's no outrage of MS paying for exclusives, many articles claiming MS did a deal behind Respawn's back, fanboys bitching about COD with mechs and anything else to take focus off of a great game and just talk about the negatives. There's no controversy for this game anymore.
Of course, MS has improved and continues to improve their console by adding more features, giving gamers more options and more importantly providing games that are actually appealing and fun.
Unlike Sony who continues to take features away, push a semi-premium console, increase the price for a sub-par network and last but not least continues to delay all their games. They made a slim version but released a pro along side it and are pushing that to consumers more but not be...
Xbox One is better than PS4, agreed. Sony has dropped the ball and continues to accidentally kick it when bending over trying to pick it up. MS on the other started off out the gate bad but then have been dropping three point shots every time they get the ball.
Ubisoft sure does believe in Nintendo.
Agreed, I mean we all know that staring and being to close to a television set is bad for your eyes and now you have a screen attached to your face. Of course this can't be good for you and I know these companies will put warning labels of 15 minutes or less should be played but who is going to listen to that?
It's a shame that this study from specialist will be ignored due to people's preference and over defensive nature for a certain company and I am sure once...
I agree, would also wait to see if this actually takes off or is this just another fad. We have all seen how Sony treats their peripherals. They start out great with a lot of great support and games and then slowly dwindle until there;s nothing left but shovelware or worse completely ignored.
Considering Sony is limiting a lot of other options for their Playstation I'm not surprised actually. No BC, no UHD player, no EA access, no mod support, no external HD support, less bluetooth headset support (compared to PS3). It really is baffling how backwards Sony is going when it comes to the PS4.
Care to elaborate?
http://n4g.com/news/1964124...
I personally think Nintendo would never want to do what Vita does.
Edit:
Crazy what one missed 'n' will accomplish.
Konami out did themselves with the portable versions of Castlevania.
More than likely this experience will showcase and push PSVR. Not expecting much else from Sony to push or show at this point in time. They will probably show how the PSVR really benefits from the PS4Pro with demonstrating some slight graphical and possibly frame improvements.
Take that up with Ubi then.
Damn that looks beastly.