yes mute is the best. On games that dont have it I end up having to turn on my mic and toss it on the floor so i dont have to hear it.
@erathaol no offence but that is the worlds most annoying feature
exactly he says "As someone who is unbiased to this" and then says "I get updates before you do on PSN" and "I have heard plenty of people complain about Modern Warfare 2 on the PS3 not getting certain updates." He clearly doesn't own a ps3. He would say my 360 gets what ever before i get it on the ps3. Don't say you are unbiased and then be completely biased; it makes what ever you say just stupid.
i agree on moh because people stopped talking cuz the chat sucks on moh but, on cod, no way have you played hours and never heard anyone talk.
those are reasons why its better not reasons to pay for it. Not one of those justifies a cost. one of his reasons was basically just mw2 and another was something that happened in February. His last point was that cant create multiple accounts with out paying... That list too me completely proves how not worth it it is if thats all he can come up with.
true but i dont really fell like that applies to rdr. Its like a new game with a different story and its 10$
the craziest part is that they wont update them. They just keep sticking with their numbers like they are the truth.
he just says the safest things. wow wii might win a holiday season imagine that. wow the highest selling game of all time (that some are still playing happily) wont be past by the same game. hes not really going out on a limb here.
or hes just expressing his opinion like you just did.
if it gets people to buy more games then they will gain money
in the comments the writer said "Yes, we’re starting off in U.S. only, but are looking into rolling out to Canada" so it will be there eventually but who knows how long youll have to wait.
yes but you get to respawn and i dont think the troops in iraq would be caught by the same sniper again. or snipers who are in the same spots in every map in very small maps, or get sniped after the sniper killed the guy right next to him and showed up on a map pin pointing where he was.
if it takes such "raw skill" then why are there so many people who do it. I did it on my first time. you just have to be looking in someones direction and you get a kill the aim assist is way easy. If you actually thought your self a good sniper then you would play a harder game. Everyone else doesn't do it because its gay. who wants to use a sniper to run around and kill people up close. it doesn't make any sense so it shouldn't be in the game.
your a noob if you cant avoid being sniped. yes snipers are one shot kills. thats what they're made for
its even more fun competitively in my opinion
cuz you dont put bills in a red box. You dont get to just use 2 dollars and walk a way with a new game. you need a card
@despair they dont lock the cross hairs because they're afraid that your unsteady hand moving the camera will be disorienting and make you sick
@Biggest i was thinking the exact same thing.
if you're gonna type something man up and do it, don't edit it out after
now all the xbox guys are trying to argue live is just as good for multiplat games, not that its better. The point in the article had nothing to do with multiplat because they are equal p2p. The only thing is that sony offers dedicated servers on a lot of their exclusives and Microsoft doesn't even do it for halo, which most people buy for mp. So why should live be 60$, the price of a full game.