All Channels
Popular
Nihongo wakarimasen

wishingW3L

Contributor
CRank: 7Score: 76770

he's not saying that 720p is better than 1080p.

Unlike PC the resources are fixed on consoles, so they can't push everything at the same time. Example: Killzone SF might be 1080p but GG must have made some trade-offs somewhere like: campaign not 60 frames locked or dynamic destruction like BF4. If the PS4 rendered Killzone SF at 720p there would be more resources to push other stuff like: higher frame-rate, more dynamic destruction, more enemies on screen, etc.

4607d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

it means you're paying more for less.

4607d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

MS doesn't make any profit from PC gaming unless the games are sold through GFWL though because in the PC environment the competition from Steam is simply too strong.

4607d ago 20 agree4 disagreeView comment

LoooooL

4608d ago 20 agree0 disagreeView comment

and the poll would be on red. ;)

4608d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I have no idea what the title even says. How does this garbage gets approved, like seriously?

4608d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

it took me at least 2 years to obtain "decent" skills on C++ and C# but this kid with only 12 years is already hacking government security. And the government often has the help of hackers to strengthen their security too.

This is the kind of stuff that makes me want to drop my studies and do something else with my life like, become a fisherman maybe?

4608d ago 25 agree0 disagreeView comment

but not any PC will be able to run BF4 at 1080p/60frames though. You talk about PC like if it were a console but what you should be talking about is about the hardware set-up you would need to achieve that.

The minimum requirement to run BF4 at 1080p/60fps: http://www.tomshardware.com...

i5 3570k CPU ($219 - newegg)
HD 7870 ($250 -...

4608d ago 9 agree1 disagreeView comment

based on low quality videos, the only thing that looks slightly better on PS4 is the water but everything else looks the same.

4609d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

and is not just the fact that the PS4 version is 900p, which is 40% higher res than 720p, or that it has AA while the XB1's doesn't but that the frame-rate is much better too. The PS4 wins on literally every front.

http://static.gamespot.com/...

4609d ago 12 agree4 disagreeView comment

to play what? To waste all that GPU raw power on games I don't like, like: RTS or F2P MMOs? Have you seen the charts of the most played PC games? It's stuff like League of Legends that look like a PS2 HD remaster.

The truth is that PC has very few games (if any) like Uncharted, God of War or Ratchet & Clank. So to me PC is pointless, except for the few multiplats it gets which BTW, PC still doesn't even has GTA V.

4609d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

but is not about watching a video since no web-based video player with capped frame-rate like Youtube's will give you an accurate representation. So the question is, do you read? Because is all written here:

http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

Frame-rate, you can't see it on Youtube but there is software that can help out: 4609d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

And here I was always attacking the Sony fans but the MS fans are just as delusional. It's been a long time since I've seen something like this on this site. People denying the fact that: 900p>720p and AA>noAA. This is beyond ridiculous.

4609d ago 9 agree2 disagreeView comment

because frame-rate is already suffering as it is or do you think that Ambient Occlusion runs on fairy dust?

http://abload.de/img/bbt8ew...

4609d ago 34 agree7 disagreeView comment

900p>720p

AA>noAA

AO>noAO

And according to DF the PS4 version has better frame-rate too. But the problem is that these crappy web video players with capped frame-rate are not enough to show everything in detail. You could change the XB1 version for the PS3 and it would look the same but the differences are pretty big.

4610d ago 13 agree1 disagreeView comment

no ambient occlusion and no AA either on XB1.

4610d ago 6 agree1 disagreeView comment

these video players aren't even 60 frames and have low bit-rate, so of-course they'll look similar. Even comparing it to PS3 it would look almost the same too. But the resolution differences are pretty big and not to mention the AA which the XB1's version has none.

If the XB1 can't run a cross-gen title at the same quality as the PS4's, things are not gonna get better from here. That's for sure.

4610d ago 15 agree3 disagreeView comment

so Neogaf was right again!

XB1 = 1280x720p
PS4 = 1600x900p

The difference in power is even bigger than the PS3 vs X360... How many times did I say this only to get disagrees and get bubble down. And on the forums too. -__-

4610d ago 14 agree4 disagreeView comment

but Titanfall doesn't even has a story at all. It's an online only game.

4610d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

thank god I did not pre-order this game since I give no craps for the cookie cutter online MP of modern FPS games.

4610d ago 8 agree0 disagreeView comment