why did people keep buying xbox 360s after the info about rrod came out? And after revision after revision failed to fix it?
the problem is that their actions have caused the game to not be made at all. If it came down to a multi plat uncharted or no uncharted, I would still want to play uncharted...
a business decision called "selling out"
i think he also means at the start of a game, all the logos you have to sit through. At least some games let you bypass them, some make you wait.
It will be interesting to see if twisted metal has logos pop up before it lets you into the game...
wait, I thought you didnt need a controller anymore with xbox.
I will Go Commando On September 20th
gametrailers! Surprised they didn't give a lower score. They have hated PS3 for years. Especially knowing that their parent company Viacom have been marketing partners with Microsoft for years. There is no way for them to even try to be unbiased. Just look at the (at least two) times that they have been busted swapping and doctoring footage to make the 360 version of their games look better.
not to mention the horrible grammar and spelling.
"... Sony seen the dissatisfaction... "
really? You sound like an illiterate fool.
it is good but it is no ff6.
and if history is any precedent, no only will reviewers get a free copy but also a free xbox to play it on.
you know, just so that they stay totally unbiased.
my bad, "copied" not stolen.
and yes ND did copy ideas from Indiana Jones, and yes Sony copied achievements. And yes MS copied many, many ideas. And that was my point, MS is rarely the innovator, they "copy" ideas.
guess the "/s" does not always make it clear. see below for proof.
wasn't talking about DOS, talking about windows, and its main selling feature at the time the GUI. Which was stolen from apple.
So it does fit the profile of letting someone else make the innovation, and then when it works, they come in and try and take over.
seems as though 86000 people have already bought it. Didn't you see the reviews, no one would rate a game that they haven't played that would be dumb. right?
/s
if you look at the history of MS, they have never been innovators or big risk takers. It is their business mentality to let someone else take the risk and then use their size and money to steamroll into the market and take over. Sometimes it works, (windows) sometimes it doesn't (Zune). It is yet to be decided if it worked or not in the video game industry.
command and conquer generals
sins of a solar empire trinity
knights of the old republic - won't run on my gpu, apparently my open gl is shit and ati stopped supporting the card.
and those crappy facebook games. *hangs head in shame*
Awesome Game. No complaints aside from small issues like long load times and beginning mission lag. And a weird bug that makes the game hang when closing. Nothing major. Overall an excellent game worth buying.
couldnt have said it better. +bubbles
Legend was for the game boy, think you mean Mystic Quest. Made for the US because they believed that the US thought that JRPGs were too difficult. Played it, it sucked.
At least SquareSoft learned from their mistake, however it seems Square Enix has decided to instead keep repeating their mistake over and over and hope for a different outcome.
So many possibilities, LucasArts used to be the best.
-Tie Fighter (or really any new space sim)
-Battlefront 3
-A new JK or Dark Forces
-Republic Commando 2
-not gonna happen but since we are having a nice LucasArts circle jerk here someone should mention a new KOTOR
Even a new adventure game like Grim Fandango or a new SW Rebellion would be nice. Just so long as its not another Kinect/move game or force unleashed...