Oh come on Grabbed by the Ghoulies wasn't that bad....even Kameo was pretty good
I liked how in Grabbed by the Ghoulies you could pick up most items to use as weapons
Wow I must be the only one who would want a sequel....
Jesus christ, two people leave and people it's Game over for Sony
Get a grip...
Honestly it's true....anything Sony related is exgerated when it's something negative
The thing is though NA has Sonys biggest attention and they still prefer the 360s more...yet places like Europe (PAL regions) who have the larger install of PS3s are treat like crap....I mean look at our PSN, the DLC, prices, PS1 classics are a mess and show you that SCEE just don't give a sh*t
At least this year the best voice actor award won't go to the person hosting the VGAs
2009 - Nolan North was robbed by host Jack Black
2010 - Neil Patrick Harris won when he was hosting it
Hopefully 2011 will be differen't and Nolan will get the award he's deserved since Drakes Fortune.
Title Fight will be there, they wouldn't just ignore the leak and then not announce it....we know it exsists now
I think he's telling the truth though except it's something even bigger then Title Fight. Kind of like tricking us so we won't be expecting Title Fight
Erm...
If you read the link I have posted above you would know that they changed the story when they added co-op. The story was already good but focusing the game around co-op killed it.
Don't try and kid your self that co-op didn't do anything because it was the main reason why the game sucked as much as it did for a RE title. If you can read that link and tell me that the story was still crap (Tyrants, zombies, Chris, Jill, horror, more of Umbrella ...
LOL
Erm....no
In turn based you had time to plan out battles, select magic (or make it actually worthy to use). It was sometimes statergy based.
Mashing a button isn't, it's more like
"PLEAS WIN PLEASE WIN PLEASE WIN" as you mash the button as fast as you can
Co-op is what killed it
Before Co-Op
http://www.relyonhorror.com...
Aftern Co-op
Crap, ruined, not so scary game
The battle system still looks terriable. It still looks like you could let it play it's self and all you would have to do then is button mash again and rely on a whole lot of luck to win.
Seriously....what was wrong with turn based combat, the only draw back was it was slow when loading a battle up...you know with all the differen't shots of the locations before the camera then moved to your characters, all they would need to do is make it a little fast paced and get ...
IT'S...A...NUMBER
It's no big deal, we've had big updates without the ".0" mark
With Vita fastly approaching, I wasn't expecting anything with the 4.0 update, I knew it would be Vita related.
If it is.....it better have Nariko as the main character...........SOME WAY.
They still have to make way for it using up disk space which could of been used to add more single player stuff.
Portal 2 was the same, yeah ok I get it some people liked Portals co-op but at the same time Valve said they had to cut the single player script because they needed to add co-op aswell, even though they could of added co-op as DLC...I mean you can't add onto a single player story as DLC as easy as it is to add a seperate co-op campaign. ME3 should of done the s...
Yeah because lets face it even though ME2 was good you moved away from the thing which made the first ME so great, kind of like how even though RE5 was still a good game it was ruined by co-op horror, instead Bioware wanted more money so they turned it into a action focused TPS.
Now you guys are wasting time and resources on multiplayer when you could of spent the money on your team and made the single player even longer and pack it more of single player features.
I think you could see in DS2, even though it was still amaing, that they were moving away from the horror aspect of the game. I mean bright lights, open enviroments, lots and lots of dialouge, no sense of being alone, the mall/shopping center was so bright and lit up that fighting enemies didn't feel as scary......it still had it's scary moments I mean returning to the ishimura was the best level in the game but you could tell they were moving away from the horror.
Yeah I know....but Insomniac said they don't want nothing to do with Spyro anymore, it's been stated many times (keep up) so I mentioned the second best choice....NaughtyDog
Wow...I comment on the fact that ND have at least went the extra mile to change the old maps instead of just releasing what was excatly in U2s multiplayer and I get dissagrees......wow just wow
...and yet reviewers have given the game good reviews, how can you give a game where you need to buy new gimmicks to unlock more content in the game a good score is beyond me.
I mean your supposed to review the game "Spyros SKYLANDERS adventure" and yet it never played like a Spyro game so how did it still get a good score.
Honestly I hope ND buy Spyro off them along with Crash. I'd rather have ND hang onto the rights then a company who are goin...
Obviously people like you who think FF8 was a porrly made game overall because of "crap" characters, drawing magic and the card game never even played it or understood it......a third likley reason could be that you just want to hate it because it wasn't FF7 which is where the small amount of hate for this game comes from....FF7 lovers.
"i'm not trying to make it sound like blind hate or anything"
To say you hated everything......y...
I thought FF7 and FF10 ended well but they got a sequel, even the crappy FF13
I think it should, Square should take that theory about Rinoa becoming Ultimecia (which they've already debunked....but still) and the SeeD have to find away to rewrite history while at the same time battle an even bigger threat....maybe another war starts.
Although to be honest I'd rather they do a remake, get FF7 out of the way and start on a remake for FF8. The Garden bat...
I've always said they should rename it
It makes more sense at the end of the day, it means more attention will be on FF Versus when it gets it's name changed since it would be a big thing